BackContentsNext

ARNO OF REICHERSBERG: A younger brother of the more famous Gerhoh of Reichersberg; d. Jan. 30, 1175. The year of his birth is not known, He received his education from Gerhoh, whose "son in the Lord" he calls himself. A third brother, Ruodger, was dean at Augsburg, and later at Neuburg. After Gerhoh's death, Arno, then dean, was unanimously chosen provost of the collegiate church of Reichersberg on the Inn, in the diocese of Passau (June 29, 1169). He wrote his Scutum canonicorum (in MPL, exciv. 1489-1528) under Eugenius III., and so earlier than 1153. It was called out by the jealousy existing between the monks and the canons, which Arno wholly condemns, pleading for fraternal unity between the two foundations with similar aims. At the same time he vigorously defends the canons' rule of life, considering them the true imitators of Christ and the apostles, especially because, unlike the monks, they occupy themselves directly with the service of their neighbors. He also wrote an apologetic treatise (ed. C. Weichert, Leipsic, 1888), defending the teaching of Gerhoh against Provost Folmar of Triefenstein, on a question of Christology-whether the man (homo) taken into God at the Incarnation is truly and strictly the Son of God. Arno vehemently asserts the affirmative, maintaining that all the qualities of the Godhead were communicated to the human nature,though veiled during the earthly life of Christ.

As a corollary he condemns the prevailing view of a local heaven, in which Christ sits in bodily presence. Underneath his polemic against Fol mar there is another, expressed or unexpressed, against a more important theologian, Peter Lom bard; and in one place he also controverts Hugo of St. Victor. Among other contemporary theo logians, he knows Bernard of Clairvaux and Rupert of Deutz. (A. HAues.)

BIBLIOGRAPHY: Wattenbach, Dt3Q, 1314, note 3; Hauck, KD, iv. 444 eqq.

ARNO OF SALZBURG: Archbishop of Salzburg 785-821. He seems to have been born in the diocese of Freising, where his name occurs in the records as deacon and as priest down to 776. After 782 he is found as abbot at St. Amand at Elnon in Hainault, which he retained even after his consecration as bishop of Salzburg, June 10, 785. He was sent to Rome in 787 to implore the help of the pope in reconciling Charlemagne with Tassilo, Duke of Bavaria, but failed, and Bavaria lost its independence the following year. Arno gained the confidence of the new ruler, however, and Cha-lemagne confirmed the church of Salzburg in its possessions (790). The bishop was employed as misses dominicus in Bavaria; and at the close of the war with the Avars, all the conquered lands were placed under the spiritual authority of Salzburg. When Pope Leo III. was driven out by the kinsmen of his predecessor, Arno was charged by Charlemagne with the task of restoring peace and order in Rome, and explaining to the pope the king's wishes for the settlement of ecclesiastical affairs in the eastern part of his realm (797). In deference to these wishes, Bavaria was included ecclesiastically as well as civilly in the Frankish kingdom, and Salzburg was raised to the dignity of a metropolitan see, Arno receiving the pallium April 20, 798. He visited Rome again in 799 to restore Leo III. once more, and in 800 for the coronation of Charlemagne. He was misses dominicus in Bavaria almost continuously from 802 to 806; he appears on the occasion of Charlemagne's making his will, and at the Council of Mainz in 813, after which he seems to have retired from public life. He was a friend of learning and art, and is said to have had more than 150 books copied.

(A. HAVcs.) BIDwooRAPev: Alouin's letters to Arno are in Jafid, BEG, vi., Monumanta Alcuixiiana, Berlin, 1873; consult also Rettberg, KD, ii. 200, 237, 558; Wattenbach. DGQ. i. (1904) 188, 172, 175 eqq., 215, ii. 505; Hauck. KD, iL

A"OOBIUS, ar-ab'bi-vs: A teacher of rhetoric at Sicca in proconsular Africa under Diocletian. At first he was a fierce opponent of Christianity, but he was converted and wrote seven books adversus nationes, in which he seeks to refute the charge of his contemporaries that Christianity was the cause of all misery in the world. To this point he devotes books i. and ii. The other books are a polemic against heathenism, showing in iii., iv., and v. the folly and immorality of the polytheistic mythology, while vi. and vii. speak of the heathen temple and sacrificial service. When the work was composed can not be stated exactly, but

301

801 RELIGIOUS ENCYCLOPEDIA Arno Arnold probably it was after 303. Araobius was neither a clear thinker, nor a skilful writer (cf. Jerome, Epist.,lviii. 10). Where he tries to pose as philoso pher, he betrays no deep study. His ideas con flict not seldom with Holy Scripture. Greek mythology he knows only from the " Preceptor " of Clement of Alexandria, and Roman mythology from the writings of Cornelius Labeo, whom he sometimes attacks. He had only a superficial knowledge of Christianity. His naive modalism is merely the expression of a very superstitious sentiment, and his notions concerning the origin, nature, and continuance of the soul have anything but a Christian-eccleaiaatical color. G. KROGEa. BIBwoaBAPHY: Arnobius's work is in MPL, iv. and was ed. by A. Reifferecheid, in CSEL, iv., 1875; Eng. transl. in ANP, vi. 408-543. Bibliography is in ANF, Bibliog raphy, pp. 78-77. Consult DCB, i.187; K. B. Franoke, Die Psytholopie and Erkenntnialehre des ArnoNue. Leipsie, 1878; W. Roll, in Philoloyus, supplementary vol. v., Cor ndius Labeo, 717-807, G6ttingen, 1889; A. Ebert, Ge echichte der L"ratur des Mittelaltas im Abendland, i. f14-72, Leipsie,1889; A. RShrioht, Die Seetenlehra des Arno bius. Hamburg, 1893; idem6 De Clernsnde Alexandrdno Ar nobii in irridendo pentilium oultu auctore, Hacpburg, 1893; C. Stange, De Arnobii orations, 13sargemand, 1893; 8charnagl, De Arnobii maioris latinitate, Gars. 1894-9b; E. F. Schultze. Das Uebel in der Welt each der Lehre des Arnobius, Jena, 1898; KrOHer, History, 304-3o8; P. 6pin dler, De ArnoUi psnere dicendi, Strasburg, 1901. ARROBIUS THE YOUNGER: Reputed author of certain writings, concerning which scholars are not agreed except that they belong to the fifth century. They include: (1) Commentarii in pealmos, which are usually thought to be the work of a semi-Pelagian Gaul, though they may have been written in Rome; (2) Adnotationea ad qucedam evangeliorum loca, which seems to have been used in the supposed gospel-commentary of Theophilus of Antioch (q.v.); (3) Arnobii catholici et &ra pioni8 conflietus de Deo tnno et uxio; (4) The so called Prcedeatinatus, which may have been the work of this mysterious Amobius (see PRADEB- TINATVS). G. Kst)axlt. BIBLIOGBAPn7: The works are in MPL. Ill). Consult DCB. i. 170; T. Zahn, ForseAumen zur Guehiehte des Ka nons, ii. 104-119, Erlangen. 1883; A. Harnack, in TU. i. 4, 162-153, Leipsic, 1883; 8. B!<umer, in Der KatlWik. ii. (1887) 398-408; A. Engelbrecht, Pabristixhe Analek tea, pp.97-99,. Vienna. 1892; B. Grand). in TQ, lmz. (1897) 568-588: G. Morn, in Revue b&g"ne. :a.. Msredsous, 1903; H. von Schubert, in TU. new ser., ix. 4, Leipsic, 1903. ARNOLD OF BRESCIA. Life to 1139 (5 1). Political Activity in Rome U 3). Banished from Italy d 2). Condemnation and Death ( f 4).

Arnold of Brescia, church reformer of the twelfth

century, was born at Brescia, but the year is not

known; he was executed at Rome 1155. At an early

age he devoted himself to the priesthood. Like

many young Italians of his time he studied in

lance and became a pupil of Abelard. His

scientific culture is particularly praised, and Abe

lard's keen criticism of tradition helped no doubt

to loosen the bonds which connected

:. Life to Arnold with the existing church

i:3g. authority. Some years later he ap

pears again in his native city, having

meanwhile been ordained priest. The Hwtoria pontr

fcalw calls him canonicus regularis and abbaa spud

Brixiam. The views to which he clung to his death were already fixed in his mind. The Church must resign worldly power and worldly possessions; priests, having worldly possessions, forfeit salvation; their necessary support they must obtain from the tithes, and the laity, who withheld from the priests what belonged to them, come in for a share of Arnold's criticism. His austere asceticism and powerful eloquence gained him great authority, which rendered his opposition formidable to Manfred, bishop of Brescia, and the latter accused him at a synod held in Rome in 1139. Arnold was banished from Italy end had to vow solemnly not to return without papal permission.

A revolution now took place in Brescia, and the " evil-minded consuls, hypocritical and heret ical men," were expelled from the city by the knighthood. Arnold meanwhile had gone to France, where he assisted Abelard a. Banished against Bernard of Clairvaux, and so from Italy. the condemnation passed by Innocent II. in 1140 on Abelard concerned him likewise; they were to be separated and kept in monastic prisons. Arnold, however, remained unmolested for the time being, because of a con flict between the king and the curia. Bernard was at first against the king, but afterward he acted as mediator, and thus after a short time Arnold had to leave France. He went to Zurich, where he soon had a following. A letter of Ber nard (cxcv.) to Bishop Herman of Constance [written 1140] caused his expulsion, but he soon found a safe refuge, for another letter of Bernard's (cxevi.) to Cardinal Guido-probably the cardinal deacon Guido who was active as papal legate in Bohemia and Moravia between 1142 and 1145- received Arnold into his retinue and honored him with his society. Arnold returned to Italy shortly after the death of Innocent (1143), and Eugenius III. (1145-53) received the fugitive again into the communion of the Church after a promise to do penance.

Rome was at that time the theater of great struggles. Toward the end of the life of Innocent II. the community had created a senate and appointed a patrician in place of the city-prefect dependent on the pope. Eugenics escaped these unpleasant relations by going to France, and Arnold developed great public activity. He attacked the cardinals, and even the 3. Political pope. A new element now comes out Activity is in him according to the Hislowia

Rome. ponti ficalis, which makes him say that those should not be tolerated who wish to enslave Rome, the mistress of the world, the source of liberty. He took up the idea of reclaiming for Rome her ancient powerful position in the world. He entered into close relations with the Roman community which had become a republic sad had promises[ to protect him against every one. Eugenics sought to get possession of Rome by force of arms, and in their distress the Romans looked to King Conrad, who, however, had no thought of realiziug their hopes, though he was is no position to help the pope in an effective manner. An agreement was made in

302

November, 1149, according to which Rome acknowledged the supremacy of the pope, but the government of the city remained in the hands of the senate. Arnold exercised his influence as before. When Frederick I became ruler, Eugenius obtained his promise of a campaign against Rome. But the Arnoldists also applied to him in a writing, the strange contents of which may be regarded as an echo of Arnolds sermons. It declares that clerics who in spite of the gospel and the canonical rules claimed for themselves the right of confirming the emperor are successors of Julian the Apostate; the Donation of Constantine is a heretical fable, which even the everyday Roman ridicules; as the empire belongs to the Romans, who should hinder them from electing a new emperor? It is possible that such eccentric schemes repelled the more prudent elements. At the elections of November 1, 1152, the Arnoldists seem to have been defeated, for the senate is soon found in negotiation with the pope, and he was enabled to make his entrance in December. A little later Frederick promised to subdue the Romans.

   When Adrian IV ascended the papal throne December 5, 1154, he demanded of the senate the expulsion of Arnold, which for the time being was not heeded. But an attack made upon a cardinal gave opportunity, shortly before palm Sunday, 1155, to pronounce an interdict on Rome, a hitherto unheard-of proceeding. §4 The depression which already existed in the city was enhanced by this measure, and on Wednesday the senate appeared before the pope and obtained the removal of the interdict by swearing to expel Arnold and his adherents. Arnold's fate was now decided. Banished from Rome, he found indeed a refuge with the viscounts of Campagnatico, but, urged by the pope, Frederick induced them to hand him over to Adrian. The city-prefect, as Rome's criminal judge, delivered him to the gallows, had his body burned, and the ashes thrown into the Tiber. He died lamented even by men who, like Gerhoh of Reichersberg, by no means agreed with him. The great cause of his death was no doubt his opposition to the worldly power of the pope. But he was also regarded as a heretic. That he held false doctrines regarding baptism has not been substantiated; but he declared that the sacraments administered by priests not leading an apostolic life were invalid, and herein one could see a rejection of the official Church and hence a heresy. That Arnold left many followers is evident from the Historia pontificalis, and in the great bull of excommunication of Lucius III (1184), Arnoldists ,are mentioned. Thenceforth only isolated notices concerning them are found; they were probably lost among the Waldensisus.

   S. M. Deutsch.

   BIBLIOGRAPHY: Sources are: Otto of Freising, De gestis Friderici, i 27-28, ii 21, in MGH, Script., xx (1868) 338-491 and ed. G. Waitz in Script. rer. Germ., Hanover, 1884; John of Salisbury, Historia pontificalis, xxxi, in MGH, Script. xx (1868) 515--545 Gunther, Ligurinus, iii, in MPL, ccxii; Gerhoh of Reichersberg, De investigatione antichristi, xlii, in MPL, cxciv; Boso, Vita Hadrians IV, in J.M. Watterich, Pontificum Romanorum vita, ii 324-325, Leipsic,1862; Gesta di Federigo I in Italia (Publications of the Intituto Storico Italiano), Rome, 1887. Consult also F. Odorici, Storie Bresciane, iv, Brescis, 1858; W. von Giesebrecht, Arnold von Brescia, Munich, 1895; idem, Geschichte der deutschen Kaiserzeit, iv, v, Brunswick, 1880-88; G. de Castro. Arnold da Brescia, Leghorn, 1875; W. Bernhardi. Jahrbücher des deutschen Reichs unter Konrad III, Leipsic, 1883; E. Vacaudard, Arnauld de Brescia, in Revue des questions historiques, xxxv (1884) 52-114; A. Hausrath, Arnold von Brescia, Leipsic, 1891.

   ARNOLD, CARL FRANKLIN: [This article has not been corrected] German Luther an; b.~ at Williamafield, O., Mar. 10, 1853. He was educated at the gymnasium at Bremen and the universities of Erlangen, Leapsic, and Kbnigs berg (Ph.D.,·1882). He was instructor in religion at the Wilhelms-Gymnasium in Konigsberg from 18,78 to 1888, when he was appointed professor of church history in the University of Breslau. Since 1898 he has also been ephorus of the GrAfliches Ledemtaky'sches Johanneum. In theol ogy he is an advocate of positive union. He has written Studien zur Geschidte der plini anischen ~"ChrWmroerfokung (Konigsbergl 1887); Die neronische Christenverfolgeatg (Leipsic, 1888); Auewahl aus J. G. Hamanns Brie/en and Schriften (Goths, 1888); Cdsarius von Arelate and die gal lische Kirche seirter Zett (Leipsie, 1894); Predigten des Cissardus von Arslote in deutacher Uebersetz ung (1895); Die Vedretbung der Salzburger Protestantea and ihre Aufnahme bei den Glaabem gertossea (1900); Die Ausrot tumue in Salzburg unter Erzbischo f Fwmian and seines Nachfolgern (1901); Priw)fw Leben in den Veteinigten Stttaten (1903). He edited the fifth and sixth editions of H. Weingarten's Zeittafeln and Ueberblicke zur Kirchengewhicltte (1897, 1908).

   ARNOLD, GOTTFRIED: [This article has not been corrected] Lutheran; b. at An. naberg (18 m. s. of Chemnita), Saxony, Sept. 5,

1688; d. at Perleberg (75 m. n.w. of Berlin), Prussia, May 30, 1714. In 1685 he began the study of theology at Wittenberg but gave himself up to independent reading in early church history. Through the influence of Spener, then court preacher at Dresden, he became tutor in a noble family of that city in 1689, and later obtained a similar position at Quedlinburg. There be became identified with the most prominent exponents of mystic and separatist teachings and in 1696 published Die crate Liebe (ed. A. C. LSmmert, Stuttgart, 1844), a eulogy on the early Christian Church in which his hostility to dogma and ecclesiasticism led him to exalt the virtues of the primitive Church as Opposed to the formulism of later orthodoxy. In

16.97 he became professor of history at Giessen, but found himself out of sympathy with the practical nature of his duties and returned in the following year to Quedlinburg. In 1699-1700 he published his Unparteiische Kirchen_ and Kdzer-Hiatorie

(4 vols.; new ed., Frankfort, 1729), which had a marked influence on church history. In studying heretical movements Arnold refused to accept as authority the evidence of hostile contemporaries and draw upon the writings of the sectaries them_ selves for his materials. In view of his constitutional opposition to orthodox doctrine this method naturally led to his assuming a position extremely favorable to the separatist. of various ages and

303

303 RELIGIOUS ENCYCLOPEDIA Arnold of Brescia Arnold, Thomas occasioned a vigorous controversy which plunged him deeper still into mysticism. From this period date his beautiful religious songs, of which a number have found a place in the evangelical hymnal. In 1704 he became pastor and inspector at Werbea, in Prussia, and from that time may be dated his reconciliation with established theology. In 1707 he became inspector at Perleberg, bringing to the performance of his duties the utmost devotion and energy. Besides his church history, his writings number more than fifty, among them, Geisdiche Gestalt siren eoaftgeliae)tert Lekrera (Halls, 1704) and Wahre Abbildung den intoendigen Chriaten thums (Frankfort, 1709). His hymns were edited by K. C. E. Eh ma nn (Stuttgart, 1856). (F. W. DIBELIUB.) Bn9rsoossmT: F. Ih'belias, l7ofbried Arnold, Berlin, 1873. ARNOLD, II ATTHEW: Church of England; b. at Laleham, near Cherteey ',32 in. w.s.w. of London), Dec. 24, 1822, eldest son of Thomas Arnold (q.v.); d. in Liverpool Apr. 15, 1888, He studied at Winchester and Rugby schools, and at Ba11io1 College, Oxford, and became fellow of Oriel 1845. In 1847 he became private secretary to the Marquis of Lansdowne, then president of the council and acting as minister of public instruction; by his influence was appointed in 1851 as inspector of schools, and held the position till 1886. He was professor of poetry at Oxford 1857-87. He was a zealous and able official and his reports upon conti nental schools, which he visited frequently, are valuable in educational literature. His poetry is of high rank; and as literary critic he wag un rivaled in his generation. He possessed a subtle mind, a keen critical spirit, and a passionate love of truth, which, when applied to religious problems, found many defects is the current theology of the time; the chief being a disposition to rest on unprov able assumptions and to ignore the chinos of reason. The greatest good he held to be pies toward perfection;. and such progress could only be made by `culture,' which meet acquaintance with the best that has been done and thought in the world. He declared thst'oonduct is three-fourths of life,' characterised religion as ` morality touched with emotion,' originated the phrase `the enduring power, not ourselves, which makes for righteousness,' and believed that ` miracles do not happen.' His works which bear on religious topics are: Culture and Anarchy (London, 1889); &. Paul and Pratea taniiatn: with as introduction on Puritanism, and the Church o f England (1870); Literature and Dogma, an canny toward a better appreciation of the Bible (1873); God and the Bible, a teniem of objections to ` Lifaratttre and Dogma' (1875); Loaf Essays on Church and Religion (1877). He oleo edited, with prefaces and notes, the two sections of the Book of Isaiah, A Bible-Reading for Schools, the great prqplaug of latael'a Reatoration [Isaiah sl. lavi.] (1872; new,ed., 187b); Isaiah of JeruBakrn [Issieh i.-xxtia.] (1883). A complete edition of his works in- 15 volumes was issued in London and New York, 1903-04. In accordance with his wish no authorised biography brie been pub lished, but his Letters, 18,18-88 ' (collected and

arranged by G. W. E. Russell, 2 vohl., London, 1895) furnish au excellent substitute.

Bmzsoaasrax: For life. DNB, 6nppt, i. 70-7b; G. W. E. Russel]. Matthew Arnold, London, 1904. Far his influence on the age. J. M. Robertson, Modern Bu manirb. London. 1891; W.H.Hndeon, Bhrdiesinlrstatioa, New Yet. 1898; J. Fitch, TAmaw sad Matfhesv Arnold and they Influence o» English EduoNios, London, 1897; G. White. Matfkno Arnold and the Spirit o/ the Ape. New York, 1898; G. 9aintebury, Matzo Arnold, London, 1899; W. H. Dawson, Matthew Arnold and kin Relation to the T6ouphf of our Time, New York, 1904; J. M. Dixon, Matthew Arnold, New York, 1908 (on the religious aide of his philosophy and poetry).

#RNOLD, NIKOLAUS: Reformed theologian; b. at Lima (55 m. n.n.w. of Breslau), Poland, Dec. 17, 1618; d. at Franeker, Holland, Oct. 18, 1880. He studied under Amos Comenius, at Donors (1635-91), and at Franeker, where Matxoviug and Cocceius were his teachers. After visiting the academies of Groningen, Leyden, and Utrecht, and traveling in England, he was appointed minister at Beetgum, near Leeuwarden, Friesland, is 1645, and professor of theology at Franeker is 1651. He edited the works of 114accovius, and published, against Boeinianism, Religio Sociniana sets eatecheaia Racoroimta major publicia disprtlatiortt7rus refutata (Freaeker, 1654); AtTteiamtta Sociniantta (1659); against the Roman Catholic Church, Apologia Amesii contra Erbantcat»um ; against the prophecies of Comenius concerning the millennium, Dis eu>gua tateologicus contra Co»unii pratensam lucent is tertebria (1660).

ARNOLD, THO>IIA3: Master of Rugby and "Broad Church" leader; b. at West Cowes, Isle of Wight, June 13, 1795; d. at Rugby June 12, 1842. He studied at Warminster and Winchester schools and Corpus Christi College, Oxford, becoming a fellow of Oriel in 1815. Re wag o

deacon in 1818, and in 1819 settled at Laleham, on the Thames near Staines, where he undertook to prepare a small number of young men for the universities. In 1828 he wag ordained priest and appointed head master of Rugby; in 1841 be was made regius professor of modern history at Oxford, but delivered only one course of lectures. He is best known as one of the greatest of English schoolteachers; but he should be remembered no lees as a keen-thinking and sharp-sighted leader of religious thought. Like Newman, Keble, and others of the reactionary High-church party, he wag alarmed by the troubles political and otherwise, which appeared to be threatening the Church. But he sought safety by advocating that its doors should be opened so that all English Christians could find room within it. Differences of doctrine, constitution, and ritual he maintained were minor matters and should be disregarded; the essential thing in Christianity is practical godliness, manifesting itself in individual and social life. Church and State alike eat to help realise this ideal and each needs the other.' His views were expressed

1 It is Tho . as Arnold, if any one, who meet be regarded as the pioneer of free theology in 1 . . . . He was the fast to show to his countrymen the possibility, and to make the sad, that the Bible should be read with honest human eyes, without the spectacles of orthodox dogmstao presuppositions, sod that it can, at the same time be

304

Arnoldi THE NEW SCHAFF-HERZOG 304 Art and Church in two pamphlets, The Principles of Church Reform (London, 1833) and Fragment on the Church (1844); his religious writings also include six volumes of Sermons: His historical works comprise an edition of Thucydides (3 vole., 1830-35); the History of Rome (3 vols., 1838-43, unfinished); History of the Later Roman Commonwealth (2 vols., 1845); Lectures on Modern History (Oxford, 1842). BIBLIOasAPar: A. P. Stanley, Life and Correspondence o/ Thomas Arnold, latest unabridged ed., London, 19o1; Stanley collected also his Miscellaneous works, 1845, and his Travelling Journals, 1852; DNB, ii . 113-117; J. Fitch, Thomaa and Matthew Arnold and their In/lurnm on Eng lish Education, London, 1897. ARNOOLDI (ar-nel'df), BARTHOLOMAEUS 4ar tholomew of Usingen): The teacher and later the opponent of Luther; b. at Usingen (17 m. n.n.w. of Frankfort) about 1484; d. at Wiirz burg Sept. 9, 1532. He entered the University of Erfurt probably in 1484, and was made master of arts in 1491. As teacher of philosophy and by his widely circulated writings he won the high esteem of both his colleagues and his pupils, among whom Luther seems to have been specially in close relations with him. When nearly fifty, and appar ently in part owing to Luther's influence, he entered the Augustinian order, and later became professor of theology in the atudium generale of the order at Erfurt. He was opposed to the later exaggera tions of the scholastic methods, but without going as far in this direction as Luther, in whose rejection of philosophy he saw one of the sources of what he considered the reformer's later errors. He took a decided stand against the Wittenberg theses; after he had been deserted by his brethren of the Erfurt house he attacked the reforming movement in his first controversial treatise (1522), directed against the fiery preaching of G'uelsa,mer and Mechler. This was followed by many others cov ering the whole range of the controversy, and be coming more and more bitter as his old pupils scorned his exhortations. He was finally obliged to leave Erfurt, and in 1526 is found in the Augus tinian house at Wiirzburg. He was not a great theologian nor even a good Latinist; but he seems to have been an honorable man who made a thor revered with Christian piety and made truly productive in moral life. He was the first who dared to leave on one side the traditional phraseology of the High-churchmen and the Evangelicals, and to look upon Christianity, not se a sacred treasure of the Churches and the sects, but as a di vine beneficent power for every believer; not as a dead heritage from the past, but as a living spiritual power for the moral advancement of individuals and nations in the pest . . . . He showed how classical and general histor· peal studies may be pursued in the light of the moral ideas of Christianity. and how, on the other hand, a free and clear way of looking at things maybe obtained by means of wide historical knowledge, and then applied to the interpretation of the Bible and the solution of current ecclesiastical ques tons' Thus he began to pull down the wall of separation which had out off the reGgioue life of his fellow countrymen, with their sects and Churches and rigid theological formulae . and . feom the general life and pursuits of the nation It is also clear as day that, if longer life had been granted him, the result of the further proeecutoa of his historical studies . . would have been further. i to apply his historical and critical principlehhtto the ~i in this and co At all direction his subsequently further prosecuted Deueloyment of y his friends and pupils.-Pfieiderer The roes in flrea< Britain Theology in MRy° Iran=and ire Prog (London, 1890), 3871i$. ough study of his opponents' writings and learned to fight them with their own weapons. At Wiirz burg he was of great assistance to his bishop, Conrad von ThUngen, in the struggle with growing Protestantism, appeared with him at the Diet of Augsburg, and was among the theologians to whom the refutation of the Confession was committed. (T. Konn>e.)

Btstxoaasra:: Ci. Veeeenmeyer. Kleine Beitrops zur peschichte des Reichetaps au Augsburg, 105 eqq., Nuremberg, 1880; N. Paulus, Der A upueMner Bartholomdua Arroldi von Usinyen, in Straebtirpar Thaolopiache Studien, i. 3, Freiburg, 1893.

ARROLDISTS. See ARNOLD of Ba>Lse1A. ARNOT, WILLIAM: Free Church, Scotland; b. at Scone, Perthshire, Nov. 6, 1808; d. in Edinburgh June 3, 1875. He studied at Glasgow, and in 1838 became pastor of St. Peter's Church in the same city; joined the Free Church movement in 1843; in 1863 succeeded Dr. Rainy as minister of the Free High Church, Edinburgh. He paid three visits to America, the last time as delegate to the meeting of the Evangelical Alliance in New York (1873). His chief publications were: Life of James Halley (Edinburgh, 1842); The Race for Riches, and some of the Pica into whack the Runners fall: Six Lectures applying the Word o f God to the Traffic of Man (London, 1851); Laws from Heaven for Life on Earth: Illustrations of the Book of Proverbs (2 vole., 1857-58); The Parables of Our Lord (1884); Life of James Hamilton (1870).

Biartoaaera:: DNB, ii. 119-120; Autobiography, and Memoir by A. Fleminp (is daughter), London, 1877.

ARftULF OF LISIEUX: Bishop of Lisieux (90 m. w.n.w. of Paris) 1141-77 (or 81);. d. in Paris Aug. 31, 1184. He was born in Normandy, accompanied Louis VII. of France to the Holy Land on the Second Crusade in 1147, was present at the coronation of Henry II. of England in 1154, and later tried unsuccessfully to mediate between Henry and Thomas Becket; he upheld the cause of Pope Alexander III. against Victor IV. at the Synod of Tours in 1163, and spent his last days in retirement in the abbey of St. Victor in Paris. His works are in MPL, cci. 1-200; moat important are his letters (Epiatolas ad Henricum II., regem Anglace, Thomam archiepiscopum, et slice), which are in MPL, ut sup., 17-152, and, ed. J. A. Giles, in PEA.

SFr SJ4ZT, OF METZ: Bishop of Metz; o. about 580; d. July 18 of an unknown year, according to Sigebert of Gembloux (Chron., MGH, Scrip l., vi., 1844, p. 324) 640. He early distinguished himself in deeds of arms and affairs of state, but

later devoted himself to an ecclesiastical career, and in 811 or 812 was made bishop of Met,. In this position he exercised considerable influence on the government of the Frankish kingdom, as a friend of Pepin of Landea, and enjoying the confidence of the Australian magnates. It was to him more than to any other that Clothair II. of Neus-

tria owed his attainment of the dominion of Australia. Araulf had been married as a young mss, and uge his son Ansegis, who married Pepin's daughter 8ga, he became the ancestor of the

305

805 RELIGIOUS ENCYCLOPEDIA drnoldi Art and Church Carolingian house. Amid all his dignities, he longed for the peace of the contemplative life; probably in 627 he resigned his see and retired into the wilderness of the Vosges, where he lived as a hermit near his friend Romarich, the founder of the abbey of Remiremont. His body rests in the church at Metz which bears his name. (A. HAucs.) BIBLIOORAPRr: Vita, by unknown author, in MGH, &rsyt rer. Mem., ii. (1888) 428-448; and by another author in MPL, acv. Consult Rettberg, HD, i. 488; Friedrich, %D, ii. 236; Bfgel, Biatoira de 6. Araoot, Bar-le-Duo, 1875; Wattenbach, DGQ, i. 144; Hauck, %D, i. 127, 161, 295, 316. ARROWSMITH, JOHN: Puritan and Presby terian; b. near Newcastle-on-Tyne Mar. 29, 1602; d. at Cambridge and was buried Feb. 24, 1659. He was educated at Cambridge, where he became fellow of St. Catherine's Hall (1623). He was successively incumbent of St. Nicholas's Chapel, King's Lynn (1631); master of St. John's College, Cambridge (1644); rector of St. Martin's, Iron monger Lane, London (1645), and member of the sixth London classis; vice-chancellor of Cambridge University (1647); regius professor ' of divinity there (1651); master of Trinity College (1653). He sat in the Westminster Assembly of Divines (1643). Robert Baillie describes him as " a man with a glass eye in place of that which was put out by an arrow, a learned divine, on whom the Assem bly put the writing against the Antinomians." He was on the committee to draw up a confession of faith, and preached thrice before Parliament, the sermons being published: The Covenant-Averaging Sword Brandished [Lev. xavi. 25] (London, 1643, 4to, pp. 28); England's Eben-ezer [I Sam. vii. 12] (1645, 4to, pp. 34); A Great Wonder in Heaven; or, a lively Picture o f the Militant Church, drawn by a Divine Penman [Rev. xii. 1, 2] (1647, 4to, pp. 44). While at .Cambridge he published Tactics sacra, sive de milite spirrituali pugnante, vincente, et triumphantedissertatio (Cambridge, 1657, 4to, pp. 363), containing also .three Orationes anti-Weige liancs. After his death there were published: Armilla cateehetica, A Chain of Principles; or, era orderly Concatenation of Theological Aphoruma and Exercitatiom, wherein the chief Heads of Chris tian Religion are asserted and improved (Cambridge, 1659, 4to, pp. 490), an unfinished work designed to form a complete body of divinity in thirty aphorisms, only six of which were completed, covering for the most part the ground of the first twenty questions of the larger Westminster Cate chism, in essentially the same order; also &av Sprrrros · or God-Man (London, 1660, 4to, pp. 311), an exposition of the Gospel of John i. 1-18, dis cussing the divinity and humanity of Christ, and maintaining the Catholic doctrine against all here- sies. C. A. Bxlaas. ARSEftIUS, dr-sf'ni-us: 1. Egyptian monk; d., nearly or more than one hundred years old, at True (Troja), near Memphis, about 450. He was a Roman of distinction, served as tutor to the sons of the emperor Theodosius, and retired into the desert of Scetis in Egypt under Arcadius. He is com memorated in the Greek Church on May 8 and in the Latin on July 19. He wrote a book of " In L-20 struction and Exhortation " for his monks, and an exposition of Luke s. 25 (ed. A. Mai, Clasaici artctor-es, s., Rome, 1838, 553-557; MPG, lxvi. 1615-26). G. KaOa>ta. Bn3LIOaRAPHY: Vita, in ASB, July, iv. 80b-831; DCB, i. 172-174. 2. Patriarch of Constantinople 1255-67; d. 1278. On the death of the emperor Theodore Lascaris II. in 1259, Michael Palawlogus usurped the throne, seized upon the legitimate heir, John Lascaris, a boy of six or seven years, and deprived him of his eyesight. Arsenius manfully espoused the cause of the young prince and was banished to an island in the Propontis in consequence. He had followers who for a number of decades remained in irreconcilable opposition and formal schism against the government. His will, in which he anathematized the emperor and his helpers, is in MPG, cgl. 947-958. G. K$t)osa,. BIBLIOaRAPB:: ICL, i. 1447-50. ART AND CHURCH. Art is the Early Church (§ 1). The Romanesque and Medieval Periods (§ 2). The Renaissance (¢ 3). Since the Reformation (§ 4).

There is nothing in the nature of Christianity

which excludes art, although in the Apostolic Age,

under the prevalence of the purely religious con

templation of life and life's problems, the knowl

edge and cultivation of it naturally receded. But

when Christianity entered into the world of Greco

Roman culture, it soon became evident that it

had great receptivity for art. If the Church al

lowed artistic decoration in the solemn resting

places of the dead, the catacombs, as early as the

end of the first century, the conclusion is justified

that art had also a place in the house of worship.

Herein the fundamental position of the Church is

clearly expressed; and the steady growth of artistic

activity during the second and third centuries

indicates not only a tacit permission, but even an

active promotion on the part of the Church, though

no definite statement to that effect is found.

Nevertheless, some doubts were felt. The existing

art was intimately connected with the cult of the

gods and was thus defiled by heathen

:. Art is ism. With this in mind, and knowing

the Early that Christian artists manufactured

Church. idols, Tertullian attributed to the

devil the introduction into the world

of artificers of statues and likenesses (De idolo

latri,a, iii.). But herein he does not touch upon

the fundamental question, having in mind only

art stained by idolatry. Clement of Alexandria

is of much the same opinion, yet he adds "let art

receive its mead of praise, but let it not deceive

man by passing itself off for truth " (Protreptikos,

iv.). The judgment of both Tertullisa and Clement

was warped by the ascetic ideal. Again the Old

Testament prohibition of likenesses of living things

had influence, and prevented all portraiture of

God in human form till the second half of the fourth

century. The Spanish synod at Elvira about 313

(sec E1.v1nA, SYNOD OF) declared that " pictures

ought not to be in churches, nor that which is

worshiped and adored to lee depicted on the

306

Art and Church THE NEW SCHAFF-HERZOG S08 Arthur

walls " (canon xxxvi.). The same considerations influenced Eusebius of Cmsarea, as may be seen from his letter to the empress Constantia; and, to a still greater degree, Epiphanius, who tore down a curtain adorned with a picture in a Palestinian village church, because it was contrary to Holy Writ (Epeat. ad Joh. Hieros., ix.). The fear that the masses just emancipated from heathenism might transfer the heathen image-worship to the Christian was not groundless. But the general view of the Church was not expressed by these voices. Men esteemed for knowledge and the Christian life take note of works of art (Augustine, Gregory of Nyssa), encourage artists (Basil the Great), or express pleasure in artistic creations (Gregory of Nazianzus). Still more explicit is the language of the monuments of art. From the time of Constantine ecclesiastical architecture, representative art,. and the minor arts made rapid progress. Not only the houses of 'worship but the holy vessels, vestments, and the like received decoration. Even an ascetic like St. Nilus planned a magnificent church (cf. Augusti, ii. 88 eqq.), and everywhere throughout Christendom bishops were eager to build (cf. Schultze, 31 eqq.). There was less reason for denying the admissibility of art, since it was believed that more than one picture had originated by divine miracle (cf. E. van Dobschats, Chriatu8bilder, Leipsic, 1899) and even the evangelist Luke was regarded as a painter (cf. T. Zahn, Einleitung in das Neue Testament, ii., Leipsie, 1899, 337).

In the Carolingian. and Romanesque periods the clergy and monks were the creators of ecclesiastical

art. The Benedictines long stood at 2. The Ro- the head. The Gothic also developed manesquQ-6nder church influence, although in it

and Medi- the lay element had a greater part. Oval Art-loving prelates are met with Periods. throughout the eptire medieval period

(cf . Otte, ii. 24-25). In the Greek Church of the Middle Age-, Church and art are even more closely connected, and the influence of the Church was greater. The freedom of art, in so far as it was taken into the ecclesiastical service, was more limited, but the current assumption that dead formalism and conventionality ruled in the Byzantine Church is an error. There was a glorious revival in the ninth century. The iconoclastic controversy had a destructive influence, but its outcome is proof of the insep. arable connection of art and Church.

The Renaissance brought a change. As it emphasized the rights of the individual and called for independence and personal responsibility, so it delivered art from ecclesiastical domination and tutelage. Free apprehension of nature took

the place of the former more or 3. The Re- less conscious dependence on tradi-

neissance. tion (J. Burekhardt, Die gder

Itenaisaanee in ItOllefi, LelpaIe, 1885; idem, Geschichte der Renaissance in Itolien, Stuttgart, 1890). In Michelangelo this freedom comes out the graandest. The Church itself, carried away by the powerful stream of the new culture was first moved by it without reflection, but its'

true ideas characterise not so much the 11tenai®sance popes, Julius II. and Leo X., as. an Adrian VI. Hence the disenchantment which soon followed.

With the restoration of Roman Catholicism after the convulsions of the Reformation, commences the renunciation of the free art of the Renaissance and a return to the ecclesiastical ideals

of the Middle Ages. Romanticism 4. Since strengthened this impulse by similar the Refor- tendencies, and modem ultramon-

mation. tane Roman Catholicism carried it out to the utmost. The inability of Roman Catholic ethics to appreciate the phe nomena of the secular life influences also the judg ment of the Church of Rome on the essence and purpose of art. It regards secular art' as on a lower level than ecclesiastical. Protestantism, on the other hand, continues the conception of the Renaissance. The standards of valuation of a work of art are not to be taken from dogmatics and ethics, but from the character of art itself. No fundamental difference between secular and religious art is recognised. With this the possibility of an unlimited, free relation between Church and art is obtained. The two branches of Protestant ism are here in perfect agreement. They per ceive in art something which is permitted to the Christian as the use of secular culture in general. But the two-confessions differ in that the Lutheran Church not only opened its houses of worship to art but asserted for it therein a necessary place; whereas the Reformed Church, strongly influenced in its ethics, as in other respects, by an Old Testa ment legalistic view, excluded art as much as pos sible from the culture and religious service in general. From this Protestantism has wrongly been suspected of being an adversary of art. But this rigor has been somewhat weakened, or wholly abandoned in modern times. From the potion of Protes tantism toward art follows its perfect independence of the ecclesiastical tradition. Much as it demands a religious and ecclesiastical art, it abstains from laying down canonical enactments with reference to its development, while constantly and properly insisting that such art shall be really promotive of its avowed lofty purpose. VICME SCHUImZ31. BIBLI06nAPET: J. C. W. Auguati, Bedrdpe our chtieddiea Rundperhhidhte, 2 vole.. Leipeie, 1841-98; A. N. Didron, Christian Iconography: or, the History of Christian Art in the Middle Apes, trend. from the Fr. London, 1861; A. Lenoir. Architecture uwuaekque, Paris ~ 1882; C. J. H-, History o/ Ancient Chrurtiauuy and Sacred Art in Ady, Florenoe, 1888; idem, History of Media NafWy and Art in Italy, vol. i., Florence 18(19. Vol. ii.. London 1872 F. Piper, Eiuleguuy iu ~ moues TheOkoie. Gotha, 1887; W. Liihke, Eftk8kw&d Art Qerm'w ding g° MWk Ayae. London, 1870; R St. J. Tyrwhitt Art Teaching of tie primChy n 1872; H. Otte HaudWA der kir,r Kuus~ do, deuurheu Miffelalsry, 2 vole., Leipsic, 18"; A. Jameaon Sacred and Art, 2 vot&,Boeten,1888; M. Stokes, Early Chridian Art in Irda9dLondon 1888· J. van Schlosser $drQax idifs de

piwhen Kunst, V~.1892- idem, Qudlenb~h a,a· guuu^ dndiedau middoltea V

E. L. Cutts, Early ChAri. London. 189a; V 9ahussa

ie~eu Rums, Munich. ll5·· F. $ rhriatlieliea %une4 2 oa, ~,.b~

1898-1900 W. Lowrie jfosne of Bra Early Ch New Yak, 1901; E. M. Her% Tics Life of o_,. Lord

307

307 RELIGIOUS ENCYCLOPEDIA Arthur Art and Church

Art, with setae Aeeount o/ flee Aniatie Treatment of the Life of $t. John the Baptist, Boston. 1898; T. Beaudoire, QeQas de to cryptopmphis apostolique et de l'architecdara rihulis. Paris, 1903; A Michel, Hid. de Part depuia lee premiere temps chr&iane, vole i.-ii., New York, 1908; end the general works on Christian art and archeology.

ART, HEBREW: The ancient Israelites accomthedpractically nothing in the realm of art. They lacked the necessary natural gifts, constructive power, and creative imagination. In the ancient time, when images of gods were indispensable to worship, their native incapacity was supplemented by no outside influence, and the old Israelitic images were of the rudest kind. After contact with more artistic neighbors had given them technical skill, the peculiar hostility of their religion to representative art prevented its development. To such an extent was this hostility carried that all likenesses of living creatures, whether human or animal, were forbidden. Such a prohibition-which survives in Islam to-daywas manifestly possible only among a people of no artistic tastes or powers; it is inconceivable among the Greeks. There is no mention of Israelitic sculpture. The complete silence concerning statues or stone ornamentation of any kind in Solomon's buildings indicates that nothing of the sort was found there. Stone sarcophagi, such as the Phenicians and Egyptians made, were not used. The mawbhoth, the cultic pillars of stone, make the nearest approach to statuary; but while among other nations the atone pillars developed into true statues of gods, among the Israelites they always remained mere pillars. Such an expression as `~ goodly images " in Hos. x. 1 probably indicates that sometimes, as among other Semitic peoples, rude forms were chiseled on the pillars. Wood carving seems to have been practised. The teraphim certainly had something like a man's head (I Sam. xix. 13). There were two cherubim of olive wood in Solomon's temple (I Kings vi. 23), and in Ezekiel's time the temple doors and walls were adorned with carving (Ezek. xfi. 17-26; of. also the later additions to the description of Solomon's temple, I Kings vii. 18, 29, 35). Doorposta and the wainscoting of houses and articles of furniture, such as divans, tables, and chairs, were thus decorated in the time of the later kings. But it is noteworthy that the masterpiece of such work, Solomon's throne (I Kings x. 18-20), was made by Phenician workmen. Metal work also developed under Phenician influence. Solomon had to send to Tyre for an artist to do the casting necessary for the temple (I Kings vii. 13-46). The art of overlaying with metal seems to have been better understood and to date from an earlier time. The ephod may have been made of wood or clay overlaid with gold or silver (see EPHOD), and the Caves of Dan and Bethel (I Kings xii. 2829) were doubtless constructed in this way. A knowledge of gem cutting is ascribed to the time of the Exodus (Ex. xxviii. 21), and the patriarchs are said to have had seals (Gen. xxxviii. 18),-which proves at least that the art was familiar and old when the narratives were written. There is mention of an iron gmving tool with diamond point (Jer. xvii. 1).

Israelitic seals which have been preserved resemble the Thenician so closely that they can be distin guished only when they bear a distinctively Israel itic name (see DuESs AND ORNAMENT, HEBREW, § 6). Hebrew pottery also has the same form as the Phenician; some of the specimens which have been found may be Phenician work. They. are painted with geometric patterns (see HANDIcRAFT$, HE BREW). Manifestly there can be no thought of a Hebrew style in any df the departments described, distinct from that prevailing in Phenicia and all Syria, and this was not original, but borrowed from Assyria and Egypt. I. BENZINGEB.

BIHwoaitApHT: G. Perroi, and C. Chipies, Histoire de fart dens t'antiquiM, iv., Paris, 1887, Eng· tranel., flietory of Art in Sardinia, Judea. Syria, and Asia Minor, 2 vols., London, 1890; Bensinger, Arehdolooie, 249-271; Nowack, Archdolopie, i. 259-208.

ARTAXERXES, ar"tax-erk'efz: The name of a Persian king mentioned in Nehemiah and Ezra, where, however, the word occurs in the form of Artachehashta, by which is doubtless meant Artaxerxes I. Longimadus, 465-425 B.C. In the Persian cuneiform inscriptions the name is written Artakhehathra, " righteous " or " sublime ruler." In Ezra iv. 7, Artaxerxes Longimanus is meant, not the Pseudo-Smerdis; so also Ezra vii. 1, 11 where, following Josephus Ant., XI. v. 1, Xerxes has been read. In the twentieth year of Artachshashta or Artaxerxes, that is, in the year 445-444 B.C. Nehemiah, the cup-bearer of the king, went as governor to Jerusalem. See PEBBIA. (B. LmDNEB.)

ARTEMON (dr'ti-men) or ARTEMA$: A heretic of the third century, founder of a small sect called the Artemonites. Nothing is known of him except what may be gathered from brief references in Eusebius, Epiphanius; Theodoret, and Photius; it seems certain that he shrank from applying the name God to Jesus, and he is probably to be classed with the dynamistic Monarchians (see MONARCH mmrsM); he was living at Rome, but separated from the Church and without influence, about 270. Paul of Samosata adopted and developed his views.

ARTHUR, WILLIAM: Methodist; b. at Kells (18 m. n.w. of Belfast), County Antrim, Ireland, Feb. 3, 1819; d. at Cannes, France, March 9, 1901. He began to preach at the age of sixteen, was accepted as a candidate for the ministry by the Irisbt Conference in 1837, and spent the next two years as a student at the Theological Institution at tHoxton, London. In 1839 he went to India, and openeda new mission station at Gutti, Mysore, but returned to England in 1841, completely broken down in health. His eyesight, in particular, was much impaired, and from this affliction he never fully recovered. He was stationed at Boulogne, 1846, in Paris, 1847-18; preached in London, 1849-50; was appointed one of the secretaries of the Wesleyan Missionary Society, 1851; first principal of the Belfast Methodist College, 1868; honorary missionary secretary, 1871. In 1888 he retired and thenceforth lived chiefly in southern France. In 1856 he was made a member of the legal committee of his Church, and from that time on was prominent in all connectional committees and

308

Articles Asceticism THE NEW SCHAFF-HERZOG 308 conference proceedings. He was president of the Conference in 1866. During the Civil War in Amen ica he championed the Union cause and wrote a series of able articles in its support for The London Quarterly Review-a periodical which he helped to found in 1853 and to which he contributed regularly for thirty years. His books are numerous and some of them had an enormous sale. They include: A Mission to the Mysore, with Scenes and Fads Illustrative of India, its People and its Religion (London, 1847; ed., with introduction, notes, and appendix, H. Haigh, 1902); The Successful Merchant, Sketches of the Life of Mr. Samuel Budgett (1852); The People's Day, an Appeal to the Right Hon. Lord Stanley against his Advocacy o f ra French Sun day (1855); The Tongue o f Fire, or the True Power of Christianity (1856); Italy in Transition, Public Seenesand Primate Opinions in the Spring of 1860 (1860); The Modern Jove, a Review o f the Collected Speeches of Pio Nono (1873); The Life of Gideon Ouseley (1876); The Pope, the Kings, and the People (2 vole., 1877; ed. W. B. Neatley, 1903); 0n the Difference between Physical and Moral Law, the Fernley lecture for 1883 (1883); Religion without God and God without Religion, a criticism of the philosophical systems of Frederic Harrison, Her bert Spencer, and Sir Fitzjames Stephen (3 parts, 1886-87).

BIBwoaaAPBY: Consult The Methodist Recorder, xlii, 11-18, London, Mar. 14, 1901, for biographical sketch.

ARTICLES, IRISH, LAMBETH, THIRTY-NINE, ETC. See IRISH ARTICLES, LAMBETH ARTICLES, THIRTY-NINE ARTICLES, ETC.

ARUNDEL, ar'vn-dl, THOMAS: Archbishop of Canterbury; b. at Arundel Castle (55 m. s.w. of London), Sussex, 1353; d. at Canterbury Feb. 19, 1414. He was the thirdson of the Earl of Arundel, and the family influence secured his promotion to the bishopric of Ely when only twenty-one; he was made Archbishop of York in 1388, of Canterbury in 1396, this being the first instance of a translation from York to Canterbury. He was active in the turbulent times of Richard II, and incurred the resentment of the king; in 1397, with his brother, the Earl of Arundel, he was impeached of high treason; the Earl was executed and the Archbishop was banished. He went to Rome, but the Pope, Boniface IX, at the request of Richard, transferred him to St. Andrews which in effect deprived him of a see, as Scotland adhered to the rival pope, Benedict XIII. He joined Henry of Lancaster on the continent, returned with him to England, 1399, crowned him king, Oct. 13, and was reinstated as Archbishop of Canterbury. He was five times Lord Chancellor of England, twice under Richard II (1386-89 and 1391-96), and three times under Henry IV. Arundel was a shrewd and far-sighted prelate in the performance of what he understood to be his duty. He spent his wealth freely upon the churches in which he was interested. In leis later years he entered heartily into the persecution of the Lollards and was especially conspicuous in the prosecution of Lord Cobham. He procured a prohibition of the vernacular translation of the Scriptures.

Biawoaswray: W. F. Hook, Lives of the ArehbiAops of Canterbury, iv, London, 1885; DB, ii, 137-141. ASA, 6'sa: Third king of Judah, son and suc cessor of Abijah. He is said to have reigned forty-one years, contemporary with Jeroboam, Nadab, Baasha, Elah, Zimri, Omri, and Ahab of Israel. His dates, according to the old chronology, are 955-914 B.C.; according to Hommel, 911-871; according to Duneker, 929-872; according to Kamp hausen, 917-877. Although in I Kings xv, 10, Maachah, the daughter of Abishalom, is mentioned as his mother, who, according to verse 2, was the mother of Abijah (called " Abijam " in I Kings; see ABIJAH), he was probably not the latter's brother, but his son, as is stated in verse 8. Maa chah was probably the name of both his mother and his grandmother, and " daughter of Abi shalom " is erroneously inserted inverse 10 from verse 2. Asa tried to uproot idolatry, and deposed his mother " ° because she had made an idol in a grove"(I Kings xv,13, A. V.; R. V.," becauseshehad made an abominable image for an Asherah;" the object in question may have been a phallic image). He drove the Sodomites from the land, and de stroyed the idols. The high places, however, were not removed. At the suggestion of the prophet Azariah (according to the Chronicler) he caused his people to renew their vows to Yahweh at a great festival. He is said to have built cities and performed mighty deeds, but no details are given. What is told of Asa's conduct in the war with Israel does not redound to his glory (I Kings xv, 16 aqq.). When Baasha fortified Ramah on the frontier between Israel and Judah, Asa could think of no better way to retaliate than to hire Ben-hadad, king of Syria, to invade Israel. The expedient accomplished its immediate purpose by forcing Baasha to retire from Ramah; but the ultimate outcome was the hundred years' war between Israel and the Arameans, which brought misfortune upon both lands and even involved Judah. The Chronicler states that the prophet Hanani was sent to rebuke Asa for his conduct, and was imprisoned for his boldness. The Chronicler further relates that in the eleventh year of Asa's reign `° Zerah the Ethiopian " invaded Judah and met a great defeat. The event is not mentioned in the Book of Kings, and some regard the narrative as unhistorical. Those who accept it have not succeeded in identifying Zerah the Ethiopian. In his old age Asa suffered from a disease of the feet, perhaps gout. [The Chronicler characteristically remarks '° yet in his disease he sought not to Yahweh, but to the physicians ".] Asa's history is in I Kings xv, 9-14;' II Chron. xiv-xvi. (W. LOTZ.) The most probable dates for Asa are 912-872 B.C. J. F. M.

BisrsoaeArar: Consult the works mentioned under ARAB, and, in addition, for Zerah the Ethiopian, H. Winckler, Alttesta-enttida Untereuehunpen, pp. 180 eqq., Leipsic, 1892.

ASAPH. See PSALMS.

ASBURY, az'ber-i, FRANCIS: The first Methodist bishop ordained in America; b. at Hamatead Bridge, parish of Handaworth (a northern suburb

309

809 RELIGIOUS ENCYCLOPEDIA Articles Asceticism of Birmingham), Staffordshire, England, Aug. 20, 1745; d. at Spottsylvania, Va., Mar. 31, 1816. He became a local preacher at the age of sixteen, and an itinerant minister in 1767; at his own request he was sent by Wesley as a missionary to America in 1771, landing at Philadelphia with his companion, Richard Wright, Oct. 27; in 1772 he was appointed Wesley's " general assistant in America," with supervisory power over all the Methodist preachers and societies in the country, but the next year was superseded by Thomas Rankin. On the outbreak of the Revolutionary War Rankin returned to England, but Asbury chose to remain. Like most of the Methodist preachers, he was a nonjuror (that is, he had con scientious scruples concerning oaths, and refused to take the oath of allegiance required by the au thorities), and he suffered some annoyance from the officials during the war. After the close of the war the Methodists were organized into an inde pendent Church, Thomas Coke (q.v.) and Asbury being chosen joint superintendents at the Christmas Conference at Baltimore, 1784, and Asbury or dained by Coke Dec. 27. The remainder of his life he devoted to the Church with tireless energy and unflagging zeal.' Asbury was fearless in the discharge of duty, possessed a keen wit and uncommon shrewdness, was far-sighted and a good organizer. He never married; and his salary was sixty-four dollars a year. His early education was defective; but in later life he acquired some knowledge of Greek and Hebrew. In 1785 he laid the foundation of the first Methodist college, and he formed a plan of dividing the country into districts with an academy in each. His journal from the date of sailing for America to 1780 was published before his death, and the remaining years were transcribed and published by F. Hollingworth in 1821; it has been often reprinted (cf. The Heart of Asbury's Journal, ed. E. S. Tipple, New York, 1905). BIBLIOGRAPHY: E. L. Janes, Character and Career of Francis Asbury, New York, 1870 (the standard biography); W. C. Larrabee, Asbury and His Coadjutors, 2 vols., Cincin nati, 1853; W. P. Strickland, The Pioneer Bishop: or, the Ldfs and Times of Francis Asbury, ib. 1858; F. W. Briggs. Bishop Asbury: a Biographical Study for Christian Workers, London, 1874; J. F. Hurst, History of the Chris tian Church, ii, 894, 905, New York, 1900. For Wesley's views on the assumption by Asbury of the title " bishop " consult It. D. Urlin, Churchman's Life of Wasky, pp. 168 170, London, n.d. ASCENSION, FEAST OF THE: In Acts i, 3 the fortieth day after the resurrection is designated as that of Christ's ascension. The Epistle of Barna r He visited Massachusetts 28 times after 1791~the state of New York 56 times. New Jersey 62 times,Penn sylvanis 78 times, Delaware 83 times, Maryland 80 times, North Carolina 63 times, South Carolina 46 times, Virginia 84 times, Tennessee and Georgia each 20 times, and other states or territories with corresponding frequency. In his unparalleled career he preached about 16,500 sermons, or at least one a day, and travel d about 270,o00 miles, or 6,000 a year, presiding in no lees than 224 annual confer snow, and ordaining more than 4,000 preachers.-Junes, p. 5. When he came to America the ltethodiste numbered 10 preachers and 600 members; when he died, after forty five yews of work. they -had M preachers and 214,235 members.

bas (xv), on the other hand, grounds the observance of Sunday on its having been the day marked by both the resurrection and the ascension. If this is to be reconciled with the Acts, it can only be by the assumption that Luke counts four weeks as four decades, just as later ecclesiastical usage numbers the Sundays before Lent in this loose way as Septuagesima, Sexageaima, and Quinquagesima; but the " forty days " of the Acts sounds too definite for this hypothesis to be accepted. The Christian Church has observed this commemoration on the Thursday of the sixth week after Easter since it has been observed at all, which could only be after the festivals of Easter and Pentecost were firmly established. Origen does not know the festival (Contra Celsum, viii, 23). It is mentioned, however, in the Apostolic Constitutions (v, 19, viii, 13); and Chrysostom has a homily for it, besides referring to it in another place. Socrates (Hist. eocd., vii, 26) mentions, under the year 390, that the people celebrated it as an established custom in a suburb of Constantinople. In the West its observance has been thought to be attested by an obscure canon of the Council of Elvira (306); in any case, Augustine knows it as an old one (Epist. liv. ad Januarium). Its celebration was specially solemn. The paschal candle, lighted at Easter to symbolize the resurrection of the Light of the World, is extinguished after the Gospel in the high mass of that day throughout the Roman Catholic Church, signifying the departure of Christ from earth. The Lutheran Reformation in Germany retained the feast as Scriptural; and it is observed as one of the principal festivals in the Anglican communion. (GEORG RIETSCHEL. )

Perhaps the earliest reference to the feast extant is that of the Peregrinatio Etherdce (0.380), which states that a feast of the Ascension was celebrated in Jerusalem toward the close of the fourth century, coinciding with the festival of Pentecost and observed on the same day. The feast marks the close of the paschal season and is a holyday of obligation in the Roman Catholic Church. In the Latin liturgy the term " ascension " is used exclusively of our Lord. J. T. C.

BrsraoaRSra:: A. Baillet, Lee Vies des saints, asec i'histoire doe f0tse . Paris, 1701; F. Probst, Breerier and Brsvierpeb4 ¢ 93, Tiibingen,1868; DCA, i. 145-147; N. Nilles, Kalendarium manuals ukiusque saleaia, ii, 384, Innsbruck, 1881.

ASCENSION OF PAUL. See APOCRYPHA, B, IV. ASCETICISM. New Testament Tescbing Attitude of the Refornmre Asceticism in the Early Tri a slue and Uses of As Church (¢ 2). cetioism U 4).

The term"asceticism'' (Gk. askilsia) originally meant " practise," especially the training of an athlete. In philosophical language it denotes moral exercise and discipline (e.g., Epiotetus, Dissertationea, iii, 12; Diogenes Laertius, VIII, viii, 8), and in this sense passed into ecclesiastical language (Eusebius, Hilt. eul., II, xvii, 2; Mar tyree Paliestinw, x, 2, xi, 2, 22). In the history of almost all religions, as well as in ancient moral

310

AmmUoism Aschheim THE NEW SCHAFF-HERZOG 810 philosophy, asceticism plays an important part, evidenced by phenomena like self-mutilation, circumcision, tattooing, fasting, fiagellations, pen ance, etc., and by the ethics of the Buddhists, Stoics, Pythagoreans, and Neoplatonists. The Old Testament manifests, on the whole, few tend encies toward outward asceticism; but later Judaism, in its Pharisaic as well as in its Hellen istic form, cultivated it, especially in the practise of fasting (cf. Dan. x, 3; Tobit xii, 8; :. New Tes- Matt. vi, 16, ix, 14; Luke xviii, 12). tament Primitive Christianity kept free from Teaching. this externalizing asceticism. The custom of fasting was retained (Matt. iv, 2; Acts xiu, 2, xiv, 23, xviii,18, xxi, 24, xxvii, 9; II Cor. xi, 27), but, as in the Old Testament, it was only auxiliary to prayer (Esther iv, 16; Dan. ix, 3; Tobit xii, 8; Luke ii, 37; Acts x, 30, xui, 2, xiv, 23), and no merit was attached to it. In place of a legal and meritorious asceticism the Lord demands watchfulness, sobriety, and prayer (Matt. xxiv, 42, xxv, 13; Mark xiii, 37; of. Acts xx, 31; I Cor. xvi, 13; II Cor. vi, 5, xi, 27; Eph. vi, 18; Col. iv, 2; I Thess. v, 6, 8; I Pet. i, 13, v, 8; II Pet. iii, 11-12; Rev. iii, 3, xvi,15), as well as a readiness to resign everything to follow him and to take up the cross (Matt. viii, 21-22, x, 38-39, xvi, 24, xix, 21; Mark viii, 34, x, 28, 39; Luke ix, 57-58, xiv, 27). In the morals of Jesus everything depends upon the disposition and free deed. Thus Matt. vi, 17-18, ix, 15, xix, 12, are not .to be understood as outward, ascetic regulations. The thoughts of Paul move along the same lines. In the moral struggle one must become master of the old man who has been put off (Rom. vii, 23, xiii, 14; Gal. v, 17; Eph. vi, 12-18; Col. iii, 5-8; I Tim. vi, 12), and discipline is also necessary to bring the body into subjection (I Cor. ix, 25-27). This is the true notion of asceticism as expressed in I Tim. iv, 7, 8. Remarks like I Cor. vii, 5, 8, 25-40 have not the value of generally received ethical laws; the legal ism of Jewish life, the contempt of marriage, the worshiping of angels, and neglect of the body are all rejected (Gal. ii, 12-16; Col. ii, 16-23; I Tim. iv, 3). The New Testament, therefore, offers the following thoughts as bases for the notion of asceti cism: the obligation of the Christian to crucify the flesh; the demand to bear the cross, to be sober and ready; and the exhortation to " exercise " the body and to fashion it into an organ fit for the ends of the Christian.

Hellenistic and Jewish influences worked together to introduce, with " moralism," in the old catholic time an ascetic order of life.

s. Asceti- The institution of certain fast-days,

cism in the fixed hours of prayer, the restricted Early use of food, abstinence from marriage,

Church. withdrawal from the world, charac terise this tendency. Asceticism, .no lees than " knowledge," came to be considered as belonging to Christianity (Clement, Strom., vi, 12). At an early period ascetics are found who retire into the desert and leave the Church from moral considerations (Iremus, Her., III, id, 9; IV, xxvi, 2, xxx, 3, xxxiii, 7). As ascetic tend encies enter more deeply into the Church (cf. the

case of Origen, Eusebius, Hist. eccl., vi, 2), and as the Church comes to know the world more intimately, it becomes easier to understand the origin of ascetic societies (cf. the pseudo-Clementine Epistles, De virganitade; Hieracasf in Epiphanius, Her., lxvii, 13; Athanasius, Pits Antonii, iii, 14; Cyril, Catechesea, iv, 24, v, 4, xu, 33; Methodius, Conviroium, vii, 3; Aphraates, Hom., vi). Here was the beginning of the later anchoretic and monastic system (see MoNAsmcctsm).

On this road the Middle Ages proceeded. The ascetic practises were extended more and more, and their extension naturally produced among the monks a state of dulness. There are two things especially which mark the history of medieval asceticism: the institution of penance with its works of satisfaction, and the idea of imitating the poverty and suffering of Jesus. The first shows a descending evolution, but the second an ascending one, tending to introspection, as in the circle of the Friends of God. The way of asceticism was considered as the way of perfection. The Augsburg

Confession (art. xxvi, 8) says of the 3. Attitude medieval period: " Christianity was

of the Re- thought of as consisting solely of the formers. observance of certain holy days, rites,

fasts, attire." On the other hand, the Reformation abolished on principle the medieval estimate of asceticism, because the solemn ascetic works are not enjoined by God, but by worthless human commandments (art. xxiii, 6 eqq., 19 eqq., savi, 18; Apol., xxiii, 6, 60, xxvii, 42-57), and can even be regarded as suicide and tempting of God (Luther, Werke, Erlangen ed., iv, 380, vii, 40, ix, 289, xi, 104). The ascetic system is also abolished by the concept of righteousness by faith which is opposed to meritorious works, which are therefore to be rejected (Auga. Con., xx, 8, 9 eqq., xxvi, I eqq., 8, xxvn, 3,44; Apo1., xv, 6 eqq.; Art. Schmal., iv, 14; Luther, xx, 250, xvii, 8, xlii, 262, AM, 193, lxv, 128, xx;, 330). Thus it is asserted that the ascetic works answer not the will of God and are not meritorious. For " Christian perfection " ascetic works are not necessary; indeed, moral conduct is the more certain evidence of God's Presence (Augs. Con., xvi, 4 sqq., xxvi, 10, xxvii, 10 eqq., xv, 49, 57; Apol., xv, 25-26, xvii, 61; Longer Catechism, precept iv, 145). But asceticism is hereby not done away with. The " mortification of the flesh " ever remains a Christian duty (Augs. Con., xxvi, 31 eqq.). But by this is not meant a weakening and destruction of the natural powers, but the self-discipline by which the natural powers are made subject to the soul, thus becoming fit for serving God. Outward fast-regulations are therefore very useful, but should never become a law (Luther, xlM, 197-199, Ixv, 128). The Protestant view is briefly this: " Every one can use his own discretion as to fasting and watching, for every one knows how much he must do to master his body. Three, however, who think to become pious through works have no regard for fasting, but only for the works and, imagining that they are pious when they do much in that direction, sometimes break their heads over it and ruin their bodies over it " (Luther, xavii, 27, 190, xliii, 199,

311

311 RELIGIOUS ENCYCLOPEDIA A°eettet'm Aaohheim 201, x, 290, xxi, 240, x, 250). It is useless to con tinue the historical review, since no essentially new types of asceticism have appeared in the Church. The Roman Catholic Church adheres on principle to the medieval conception, yet in the Jesuitic " Spiritual Exercises " the purely sensual asceticism strongly recedes, and there is accommodation to the modern spirit. Mysticism and pietism in evangelical Christendom have demanded renunciation and seclusion in a one aided manner (cf. C. E. Luthardt, Gesckichte der Ethik, ii, Leipsic, 1893, 154 aqq., 248 aqq., and the histories of pietism by Ritschl and Schmid; see PfgsM). Asceticism is a special moral act. Christian moral acts are free, devoted to the acquisition of the highest good or the realisation of the 4. True kingdom of God. They have for their Value and object the reformation of one's own Uses of As- personality (conversion and sancti ceticism. fication), as well as the influence on the surrounding conditions to be realized by this personality. The Christian life is a con tinual fight with sin, but is to overcome it by virtue of the effects of grace. This task can not in itself be called an " exercise," since it rather denotes the self-preservation of the Christian. To effect this self-preservation in the struggle against sin the Christian must indeed exercise and stretch his powers for the struggle. The object of morality is opposition to sin and the positive exemplification of the good. To bring this about it is necessary to have the mastery over the natural gifta and powers of man, which is obtained by attention to self, by watchfulness, and by accustoming one's own nature to subjection to the moral will. Asceticism is not directly a struggle against sin and realization of the Christian good, but it aims at such a rule over the natural powers that one is qualified to follow the good will readily in the struggle against sin and in the positive moral exemplification. The typical forms of asceticism (fasting, self-denial, etc.) show that the question is not directly the overcoming of sin or of doing good works, but the training of the natural powers for both. This is the specifically evangelical conception of asceticism. On the other hand, the Roman Catholics define as ceticism as a direct moral act and as" the summary of all which serves to promote moral perfection" (Pruner, in HL, i, 1460); or asceticism is ex plained as that part of theology which "develops the principles of Christian perfection and points out the practical rules which bring about the soul's elevation to God " (J. Ribet, L'Ascttique clrMenne, Paris, 1888). Here the various exercises of asceti cism are moral self-interest and good works, whereas, according to evangelical conception, aseetieism is self-discipline to make one fit for good works; in this subordination it is a moral deed itself. Asceticism is therefore self-control in the true sense of the word. Upon a closer examination the point here is this: (1) The task is to exercise nature in patience, watchfulness, self-denial, and sobriety, so that it becomes fit to bear the sufferings of the cross sent by God as a blessing. These are given to man

from God for " the mortifying of the flesh "; the question is not of self-mortification and invited martyrdom. The cross is not to incite the Christian to sin, but to restrain the sinful lust. From this point of view the Christian is to consider the suffering and be affected by it. (2) Our nature in consequence of the sinfulness of man is exercised and ready to walk the ways pointed out by the evil will. In concrete things it exemplifies chiefly the dominion of the sensual desires over the spiritual will. Over against this, it is a Christian duty to accustom nature to subjugation under the .spiritual will, to the regulation of the desires, to regularity and propriety of life, to steadfastness in useful work, to the proper relation between labor and recreation. Here one has to deal with moral gymnastics, which are to fit human nature to obey the good moral will imparted by grace. (3) For each man exist certain thoughts and incentives which in themselves are morally indifferent, but, as experience teaches, may become a temptation to the individual. To restrain these is the further object of asceticism; and herein it includes fasting in the ardent sense, e.g., with reference to society, eating and drinking, matrimony, sexual intercourse, novel-reading, the theater, dancing, total abstinence. etc. The question here is of a moral dietetics. With this the field of asceticism is circumscribed. Only it should be added that the ascetic practic&1 proof must never become a law; it calls only for individual selfrestraint. This, however, as little precludes ascetic habits in the individual as ascetic customs in communities. It mu4 also be emphasized that the question can not be as to the meritorious character of asceticism; for, in the first place, this thought has no place in evangelical ethics; in the second place, because the necessity of ascetic exercises proves not man's moral maturity, but immaturity. Finally, it must be remarked that in the concrete life the ascetic practical proof can not be separated from sanctification and the moral struggle. R. SzEHEftfi.

131BLIOGRAPHY: 0. Nitsoh, Praxis morttilis ifs. Goths. 1725; E. Kist. CAriaaide Asodik, 2 vole.. Weasel. 1827 28; 0. Ztiokler, %rigachs tdite der Asksm, Er, laagen, 1883 (contains a bibliography); idem, Askew and M6schtum, 2 vole.. Frankfort, 1897; DCA. i. 147-149; Schaff, Christian Church. i, 387-414; J. Mayer. Die dusst lidhe Asoms. Freiburg. 1894; R. 13eeberg, in tifi<A, dx .(1898). 508 sqq.; C. E. Hooijkws. Otslijke Amem. Leyden, 1905; a detailed treatment of asoeti oism. Jewish and Christian, of the latter in all periods is given in Neander, Christian Church, consult the Index; also the works on ethics and Christian morals, such as those of Reinhard. Rothe, Dorner, Msrtensen. Harlem. Vilmar, oettinger. Frank. H. Schultz. Luthardt, Wutke, and Smyth, and see Bmcs, and Moxssazcroa.

ASCHHEIM, ash'haim, SYNOD OF: A synod held in a village of what is now Bavaria, a little to the east of Munich. The church there is mentioned in the seventh century. The year of the synod is not definitely named; but since Tassilo is mentioned as prince, and as still very young, and since its decrees are evidently influenced by those of the Frankish synod of Verneuil (July 11, 755), it must have been held either in the latter half of that year. or in 756. Its canons are directed partly to the regulation of various ecclesiastical relations (ii, for the security of churches, and iv, of church

312

Asherah Ashtoreth THE NEW SCHAFF-HERZOG 812

property; v, payment of tithes; xiii, recognition of the canonical law as to marriage) and partly to the affirmation of the rights of the episcopate (iii, power over church property; vi, subordination of the clergy, and viii, ix, of monks and nuns; xiv, xv, spiritual oversight in courts of justice).

A. HAUCK. BisnroasAPey: The Cayitula are in MGH, Leg., iii (1883), 457-459; ib. Conch., ii (1904),58-58. Consult Hefele, Con- ciliengesehichte, iii, 597-802; Hauck. %D, 1890, ii, 399.

ASHERAH (pl. asherim; in Judges iii, 7, II Chron. xix, 3, xxxiii, 3, asheroth): The transliteration of a Hebrew word which in the A. V. of the English Bible (following the LXX and Vulgate) is rendered "grove" or "groves" (see GROVES AxD TREKS, SACRED); in the A. V. the word is trans-

ferred (" Asherah ") without attempt at

Two Dis- translation. In explaining its meaning tinct two entirely different senses in which

Meanings. it is employed must be distinguished:

(1) as a sacred tree-stem or pole; (2) as the name of a Canaanitic goddess. There is now no doubt of the general meaning when the word is used in the former sense. Exactly what the latter refers to is still a matter of much debate. There are only three passages (Judges iii, 7; I Kings xviii, 19; II Kings xxiii, 4) in which the word (used with ba'al) clearly refers to a goddess; or, rather, only two, for in Judges the reading should be `ashtaroth (pl. of 'ashtoreth; see AsHToRETH) as in similar early statements with regard to forbidden cults. The passage I Kings xv, 13, often supposed to refer to the worship of a goddess, should be translated as in the R. V. " made an abominable thing for (i.e., as) an asherah." The other two passages in Kings are regarded by recent conservative commentators as interpolations (cf. R. Kittel, Die Biicher der K6nige, Gottingen, 1900, pp. 143, 300), and certainly justify the conclusion that at a late period asherah was used as another name for Ashtoreth. How this came about may be explained from the history of the asherah in Israel.

In preexilic times an asherah was not a divine companion or concurrent of a bawl or the baals at all. It was, however, an indispensable part of

the normal baal-worship. A "high-

The Pre- place," or shrine of the baal (bamah) exilic consisted of an altar (with or without

Asherah. a " sanctuary "), a mapebhah or stone

pillar, and an agherah (see ALTAR; HUGH PLACE; MEMORIALS AND SACRED STONES). The pillar was a survival of the old stone-worship; that is to say, the adoration of the local deities or numina, who had their abode in sacred stones (cf. the bathed of Gen. xxviii, 19 and elsewhere). The asherah Or sacred pole was in like manner a Survival of the old tree-worship, that is, of the cult of sacred trees whose sanctity is a marked feature of the early histories (e.g., Gen. xii, 6, R. V.; Judges ix, 37, R. V.). In the Hebrew text of Dent. xi, 30; Judges ix, 6 (cf. R. V.) the sacred tree and the sacred stone appear standing side by side. One step further in the inevitable syncretism was the combination of both of these with the cult of the baal, the presiding divinity or `° proprietor " of the district, who gave fertility to its soil and all

consequential blessings to its inhabitants (cf. Hos. ii, 5, 8; see BAAL). Whatever other factors may have contributed to this cherishing of the asherim, these are the moat important. At first the asherim were probably the stems of trees rudely chopped and stripped; afterward they were conventionalized into a shapely pole or mast, just as the " pillars " or magebhoth were at first roughly hewn blocks of stone.

At a later stage the asherah became transfigured into a goddess and naturally took the place of the

old Ashtoreth in the imagination of Trans- the Hebrews, who, after the Exile, folformed lowed no longer the old Canaanitic into a rites. The fact that the worship of Goddess. Ashtoreth had been combined with that of the baals, or rather absorbed into it, doubtless helped toward the substitution. The deification of an outward object of worship is a familiar phenomenon in nearly all religions, and in the present field of inquiry is actually paralleled by the conversion of a bethel or bait-ill (a god-inhabited stone) into a god, Baitulos, among the Phenicians and elsewhere (cf. Schrader, KA T, pp. 437-438).

Whether the fact that there was an old Canaanitic goddess Ashirtu, with a Babylonian namesake, aided in the confusion, in the Hebrew literature, of the two senses of asherah, is not quite clear. It is, at any rate, practically certain that in the time of the active idolatrous worship of Israel the asherah was not a goddess. See ASHTORETH.

J. F. MCCURDY. BIBIJOOBAPHY: B. Stade, in ZATW i (1881), 343-348, iv (1884), 293-295, vi (1888), 318-319; T. K. Cheyne, The Prophecies of Isaiah, ii, 291-292 London, 1882; O. Hoffmann, in ZATW, iii (1883), 123; idem, Ph6 nikiwA@ Inechsiftea, in Abhandlunpen der 0dWaper Go aeuaehaft der Wisaenwhaften, axxvi (1889), 28-28; M. Ohnefalech-Richter, %Npros, die Bibe1, and Hmner, pp. 144-208, Berlin, 1893; Smith, Ref. of Sem., pp. 187-190, 489-479

ASHIMA, a-shai'ma: A deity of the Hamathites, whose capital, originally called Hamath, afterward Epiphania, was on the Orontes, north of the Antilebanon. They were transported into Samaria by Shalmaneser to replete that depopulated district (II Kings xvii, 30). The deity was therefore Aramean, and was regarded by the Septuagint as feminine, but since nothing is known of it beyond what is told in II Kings, all suggestions as to its identity are mere conjectures.

ASHTORETH. The Cult in Palestine and Worship. Its Astral Sig Syria (51). nificance (; 5). Significance of the Related The Sensual Development Names (§ 2). (§ g) Extension of Ishtar Wor- The Worship as Spiritual ship ($ 3). iced (¢ 7). The Early Ishtar Cult (¢ 4). Tendency of the Cult in Is Dominant Types of Ishtar rael (§ 8). Ashtoreth is the name of a goddess whose wor-

ship, mostly associated with that of Baal or the baals, figured largely in the history of idolatry in ancient Israel. This divinity. is especially marked as a goddess of the `° Sidonians " or Pheniciana

(I Kings xi, 5, 33; II Kings xxiii, 13). She had also a temple among the Philistines at Ascalon,

313

313 RELIGIOUS ENCYCLOPEDIA AAht*reth

probably the same as that mentioned by Herodotus (i, 105) East of the Jordan her worship was rife in Moab, combined with that of the

r. The national god, Ashtar-Chemosh being Cult in Pal- named on the Moabite Stone in the estine and ninth century B.C.; and the place

Syria. names Ashtaroth (Dent. i, 4 and elsewhere), Ashteroth-Karnaim (Gen. xiv, 5), and Be-eshterah (Josh. xxi, 27) indicate its prevalence in the country of Bashan. That it was of ancient date in southern Syria is proved by Egyptian references to the goddess " Aehtart of the Hittite land." The most widely attested of three branches of the general cult among Canaanitic or Hebraic peoples is the Phe nician, which is commemorated by many inscrip tions both in the home country and in the western colonies.

This famous goddess is also widely known as Astarte, which is the Greek form of the Phenician 'Ashtart. The name Ashtoreth itself in the orig inal Hebrew texts was 'Ashtareth, the s. Signifi- Masoretic form being a change made cance of by using the vowels of bosheth, " the the Rela- shameful thing," a nickname of Baal ted flames. (q.v.). The Phenician ' a shtart clearly points to the correct reading, as also does the Hebrew plural 'Ashtaroth. The Babylonian and Assyrian forth Ishtar is modified from 'Ashtar, according to a regular phonetic law, through the influence of the initial guttural. 'Ashtar is identical with the South Arabian 'A& tar and Aramaic and North Arabian 'Atar (from 'Athtar), the former being a god and the latter apparently a goddess. Of the Arabian cult very little is known. When more has been learned of South Arabian mythology, much of the mystery which surrounds the origin of the universal Semitic worship of Ishtar-Ashtoreth will be cleared up.

The following are the most important of the facts which may be regarded as established or practically certain: The cult originated in Babylonia and spread northward to As3. Exten- syria, northwestward to Mesopotamia, sion of Ish- thence to Syria and Palestine, and tar Worship. thence through the Phenicians to all of the Mediterranean peoples; south and southwestward it spread to Arabia, and thence across the sea to Abyssinia.

Both the name and the dominant forms of the cult were of Semitic and not of 11 Turanian 11 or Sumerian origin. There was a god-

4. The dens Nana (q.v.) at Erech in South Early Babylonia, who was held to be iden Ishtar ticbl with Ishtar simply because she Cult. had been worshiped there by a non Semitie people, and, having attributes akin to those of Ishtar, was replaced by the latter when the Semites took over the ancient shrine. A similar syncretism took place under the same con ditions in the interest both of Ishtar herself and of other Semitic divinities which she absorbed and superseded. The word Ishtar is a Babylonian verbal noun of the ifteal stem though the etymol ogy is still unsettled. The worship of Ishtar was of very complex or-

igin, both in its primary and in its secondary sources. When in greatest vogue as a principal Semitic religion it was, as above indicated, a composite or syncretism of many related cults, non-Semitic as well as Semitic. Of these some left deep traces of their original distinctive features and remained in part practically separate cults. Such, for example, was the worship of Ish-

tar of Arbela, in which the divinity g. Domi- appears as a war-goddess-an attrinant Types bute probably suggested by the very

of Ishtar natural conception of the planet Worship. Venus being the leader of the starry Its Astral hosts. Ishtar was in fact primarily

Sigaiti- and chiefly identified with this most cance. beautiful of celestial objects, especially

as the evening star. This conception spread from Babylonia through the other Semitic lands to the Phenician settlements, and then mainly byway of Cyprus, to the Greeks and Romans as the cults of Aphrodite and Venus. Among its primary sources, therefore, the worship of Ishtar was in large part astral, and Venus was its favorite celestial object. This combination was not of late origin, but is known to have been made in very early times (cf. Schrader, RAT, pp. 424 sqq.)The moon in the Ishtar cult never took the place of Venus; for the moon among the Semites was a male deity, whose worship was older than even that of Ishtar and was centered in Sin, the moongod par ezceuence. Hence Ishtar in the inscriptions is represented not only as the daughter of Ann, the great heaven-god, but also as the daughter of Sin. It was as impossible that " the queen of heaven " of Jer. vii, 18 and other passages could be a name of the moon among the Hebrews in Palestine or Egypt as it could be among the Babylonians. The identification of Ishtar with the fixed star Sirius and with the constellation Virgo (perhaps through its beautiful star Spica), though comparatively early, was of secondary origin.

From the terrestrial side the primary motive of the worship of Ishtar was the impulse to deify

sensuousness and sensuality. Of the 6. The resulting worship Ishtar-Venus became

Sensual the celestial patron. She not only

Develop- legitimated the sexual indulgences meat which marked her cult in Babylonia,

Phenicia, Palestine, and the Semitic world generally, but she was naturally taken as the authoress of the sexual passion and therewith of all derivative and associated sentiments. This accounts for the part played by Ashtoreth or Astarte as the female counterpart of the Phenician Baal and of the local Canaanitic basis, and also for the wide-spread and influential myth of her

relations with her lover Tammuz or 7. The Wor-Adonis (Esek. viii, 14); see TAMMm. ship as Linked with these primary attri Spiri- butes in the most remarkable and tnalized. instructive ways was the worship of

Ishtar as the fountain of the tenderest and most sacred human sentiments, also of imaginative conceptions of external nature, and even experiences of the inner moral and spiritua,llife (on the process of transition of. J. F. McCurdy,

314

AAhtoreth Ads, Xinor THE NEW SCHAFF-HERZOG 814

History, Prophecy, and the Monuments, iii, New York, 1901, §§ 1184 eqq.). The best illustrations are afforded by the Babylonian hymns to Ishtar as the great mother-goddess, as the creator of the animate universe generally (cf. the exordium of Lucretius, De rerun natura), and as the helper of men, freeing them from sickness and the curse of sin and guilt.

Though we learn nothing directly from the Old Testament as to the character of the service of Ashtoreth in Palestine, the connections in which the word occurs make it clear that, whatever else may have been here and there included, the lowest forms of Ishtar worship were ordinarily exhibited. The regular association in the singular with " the

baal " and in the plural ('Aahta 8. Tendency Loth) with " the baale " indicates the

of the predominance of the sexual aspects Cult in of the many-sided cult. Its popu Israel. lanty and seductiveness are also mani fested in the use of the plural (exactly as in Babylonian) as an equivalent of goddesses in general (Judges ii, 13, x, 8; I Sam. vii, 3, 4, xii, 10) in passages which, it is true, pled from later deuteronomic editing, but are therefore all the more indicative of the prevailing tendency. A comprehensive historical view of the whole subject helps to understand the fascination of Astarte worship as a seductive and formidable ob stacle to the service of Yahweh. See AssxesiA, VII; ATABGATTe; ABH10$AH; BAAI.; BABYLONIA, VII, 2, § 7; 3, § b. J. F. MCCURDY. BIBLIOGRAPHY: J. Selden, De die Syria, ii, 2, London, 1817; F. Miinter, Die Religion der Cardiaper, pp. (i2-88, Copen hagen, 1821; F. C. Movers, Die Pk6nisisr, i, 869-M,, Bonn, 1841; E. Schrader, Die HdUentahrt der lafar, Gies sen. 1874; idem, RAT, pp. 438 sqq.; P. Berger, L'Anpe d Astart4, Paris, 1879; F. Hung, BiUische Theolopie des Alien Testaments. pp. 17 eqq., Carlsrube,1880: P. de I.a garde, Astarte, in Nachriddsn van der GesellaeWt der Wis sansehaften au Gattinpen, 1881, pp 396--400; C. P. Tieb, La Deesse Istar ewtout dans 1e myths Babylonian, Leyden. 1884; F. Baethgen, Beitrage sur semibwhen Relipionepe sehickte' pp. 81-37, 218-220, Berlin, 1889; Collins, A#Ar to" and ks 'Aahera in PSBA ri (1888-89), 291 308; A. Jeremiae Die babylonixh-assyrisohan Vorstell1wnpen van Laben nach dens Tode, pp. 4-45, Leipsio. 1887; idem. .

Isdubar-Ninarod, pp. 57-88, 58-70, ib. 1891; P. Jenson, Die KosmoWis der Babylonier, pp . 117-118, 135, 227 oqq., Strasburg, 1890: Ashtoreth and Her Inigusnoe in the O. T'.

n JBL, z (1891 ), 73 eqq.; G. A. Barton. The Semitic Ishtar Cult, in Hebmica, is (189283). 131-156, z (1893-94).1-74. For the " Q ueen of Heaven " consult: B. Stade, in ZATw, vi (1880), 123-132, 289339; E. Schrader. in Sitcunpaberidafe der BeRinerAkademie, 1888, pp. 477-491; idem, m ZA, iii (1888), 853384; iv (1889), 74-70; J. Well-' haueen, Heidenthurn, pp 88 sqq.: A. Huenen. De Mels cketh des Hemsk, Amsterdam, 1888 (Germ. tranel. in Ge-

snudte A64an"spm, pp. 89211, Freiburg, 1894).

On the connection between Aphrodite and Astarte consult: J. B. F. Lajard, Iteeherc)ma sur Is cults de VEnus, Paris, 1837; W. H. Eogel, Hyprot, ii, b-849, Berlin, 1841: L. F. A. Maury. HiNoirs des religions de la Ordoe antique iii, 191-259, Paris, 1869· F. Hommel, Aphrodito-Astarte, in New Jahrbaeher %flr Ph>Tobphie and Pedopopie, mocv (1882). 178; Ohnefadeoh-Richter, ut sup.. Pp. 227; DB, i, 156, 187-171; M. Jaetrow, The Religion of Babylonia and Assyria, Boston, 1898 (of. Index under Ishtar); BB, i. 330-883, 336-339; G. A. Barton, A ,3ketrA o/ Semitic Origins, pp. 108. 248-258. Now York. 1902; Schrader. RAT. pp. 438938.

ASH WEDNESDAY (Lat. Dies cineris, feria quarts cinerum): The first day of Lent, the beginning of the forty days' fast before Easter in the Western Church. The name is not simply a general allusion to the repentance in sackcloth and ashes of which the prophets speak in the Old Testament, but refers more directly to a rite which marks the observance of the day in the Roman Catholic Church. The palm-branches blessed on the PahnBunday of the previous year are burned to ashes, and these ashes are placed in a vessel on the altar before the beginning of mass. The priest, wearing a violet cope (the color of mourning), prays that God will send his angel to hallow the ashes, that they may become a salutary remedy to all penitents. Then follows the prayer of benediction, witch explains the symbolical meaning of the use of ashes still more clearly. The ashes are then thrice sprinkled with holy water and censed, after which the celebrant kneels and places some of them upon his own head. The congregation then approschthe altar and kneel, while the sign of the cross is made upon their foreheads with the blessed ashes; to each one are said the words Memento, homo, quia pulroia ea et in pulverem reverteria (" Remember, O man, that dust thou art and unto dust shalt thou return ").

It is impossible to determine accurately the date at which the imposition of ashes, which originally formed a part of the public penance for grievous sinners, became a custom applicable to all the faithful. It is demonstrably at least as old as the synod of Beneventum in 1091, which expressly commands it for clergy and laity alike. In the Anglican communion the day is marked by a special service known as the " commination service," (q.v.) or at least by a special collect and Scripture lessons; and the Irvingite liturgy also contains prayers for it. See CHuRcH YEAR.

BIBLIOGRAPHY: Bingham, Oripinee, book :viii. chap ii, E 2; G. BevineU History of the ie)'ormakon of Ale Church of England, ii. 94, London 1881; J. Butechksr, Oebraueke, pp. 91-152, Vienna, 1848.

ASIA MINOR IN THE APOSTOLIC TIME. I. The Name. V. The Islands of the N4esn Sea. I%. The Province Ciliois. II. The Province of Aeis. VI. The Province PonturBithynis. 7C, Cyprua. III. The Imperial Cult. VII. The Province Galatia. X1. The Province Cappadocia. IV. Cities. VIII. The Province LyoirPsmphylis. I. The Name: The term "Asia Minor" is not found is the New Testament; it is said to occur filet in Oroeius, i, 2 (400 A.D.). In the apostolic period "Asia" denoted the continent, Asia Minor, and the Roman province of Asia. Paul no doubt under stood by Asia, the Roman province (I Cor. avi, 19; II Cor. i, 8; II Tim. i, lb). The Apocalypse in cludes also the Phrygian Laodices; and the provin-

cial district is doubtless meant in I Pet. i, 1, where Asia stands after Pontus, Galatia, and Cappadocia and before Bithynia, though it is uncertain whether the author ass informed of the political character of these designations. How far the Roman provincial demarcations had become familiar to the people it is difficult to tell. There are passages in the New Testament in which the term Asia is used

315

$15 RELIGIOUS ENCYCLOPEDIA Amis Minor

in a narrower sense. In the time of Paul the country was still in a stage of development.

11. The Province of Asia: When Attalus III of Pergamos in 133 H.c. willed his country to the Romans, it was declared a province, though the real organization was not effected until 129. The main parts were the maritime districts Mysia, Lydia, and Caria. With these Cicero (Pro Plaew, xxvii, 65) mentions Phrygia, which belonged to the province after 118. Under the emperors Asia was a senatorial province ruled by a proconsul, whose seat was at Ephesus. The diet of the province, to which representatives (Gk. asiamhai; cf . Acts xis, 31) were sent, met annually in different cities. Its powers and duties culminated in the imperial cult; and hence it was presided over by the sacerolm provin cica or, Greek, amhiereus tf Asias, who offered the sacrifices and pronounced the vow for the emperor and his house. This office changed annually and the years were dated accordingly.

III. The Imperial Cult: The empire as the guaranty of peace and the source of all blessings of culture appeared to the people as a divine power. From his point of view the author of the Apocalypse (xiii, 3-8) describes this worship of the empire by the world. He is convinced that the empire owes its success to a supernatural power, but not to the God of heaven-rather to the devil. The Jews as a rule enjoyed religious liberty throughout the empire, and were not required to take part in the imperial cult. What Caesar had granted to them was confirmed by Augustus and Claudius. The sufferings of the Christians of Asia Minor, mentioned in the First Epistle of Peter, were not caused by their refusal to take part in this worship (cf- ii, 13 aqq.). It is true that the populace hated and persecuted the Christians, but not because they refused to honor the emperor; the name of this new supemtuio was distrusted and outlawed as at Rome in the time of Nero (Tacitus, Aanalea, xv, 44).

IV. Cities: The number of free cities was steadily reduced under the emperors; and immunity from taxation was granted in place of autonomy. An edict of Antonim Pius divided the cities into three classes according to size and importance. Puny (Hint. net., V, xxix, 105 sqq.) mentions nine cities which possessed a court of justice, viz.: Laodices ad Lycum, Synnada, Apamea, Alabanda, Sardis, Smyrna, Ephesus, Adramyttium, and Pergamos. Ephesus, at the mouth of the Cayster, often called on inscriptions " the first and greatest metropolis of Ate," was the seat of the proconsul. Another title of the city is " temple-keeper " (i.e., of Diana; d. Acts xix, 35, R. V.; the Greek is neakoroe, the usual word for the custodian of a temple). A college of virgin priestesses ministered to Diana, presided over by a eunuch called Megabysos. It was no exaggeration of Demetrius when he said that the Ephesian Artemis was worshiped not only by all Asia, but by the whole world (Acts xix, 27); for through Ephesus flowed the commerce between the East and the West. Among the strangers riding them were manyiewe, who had& synagogue (Actoxviii,19, 26, xix, 8) and enjoyed special privileges, especially

those who were Roman citizens, as may be seen from documents contained in Josephus and Philo. Ephesus was a member of the confederation of the thirteen Ionian cities, of which Miletue was the head.

A great road led from Ephesus to Magnesia, where was another temple of Anemia which Strabo places on a par with the Ephesian. Christianity came to Magnesia from Ephesus; among the epistles of Ignatius, that to the Magnesians immediately follows that to the Ephesians. After Magnesia, Strabo mentions Tralles (also mentioned by Ignatius), once a wealthy city, called Ciesarea under Augustus. Jews also dwelt there; and it is possible that the Gospel was brought thither from Ephesus (Acts xix, 10). It seems that special missionary attention was devoted to the cities along the Mean der-Lykos road; for one meets with the three closely connected Phrygian congregations Laodicea, Hierapolis, and Colossee, of which Laodicea was the most important and is alone mentioned in the Apocalypse. The Christian community seems to have shared in the wealth of the city (Rev. iii, 17). Laodicea never had an emperor's temple. Polycmtes of Ephesus mentions among the " great lights" of Asia a bishop and martyr with the Phrygian name Lagaris as buried at Laodicea (Eusebius, Hist. eccl., IV, xxiv, 5). In 185 there was " great strife concerning the Passover there " (ib. IV, xxvi, 3). Colossae, an important city of Phrygia, was long the seat of a bishop. More important than Colossee was Hierapolis, the native place of the philosopher Epictetus, and the place in which the apostle Philip lived and died. Papias was bishop of Hierapolis, as was also Claudius Apollinaris. ApameawasfoundedbyAntiochusBoterand was the seat of a conventus jwidieua. That many Jews lived hem is known from Cicero (Pro Plaoco, xxviii); they had their own constitution, a "law of the Jews."

The Lydian Philadelphia was sparsely populated on account of the frequent earthquakes. The Gospel was brought thither from Ephesus. Philadelphia is one of the seven churches of Asia mentioned in the Apocalypse (iii, 7-13); among its inhabitants Jews are mentioned (iii, 9). Ignatius addressed an epistle to the Philadelphians; and Eusebine (Hint. ecd., V, xvii, 3) mentions a prophetess Ammia of Philadelphia. Sardis was the ancient city of the Lydian kings. Jews lived there, having their own jurisdiction. The Church at Sardis, one of the seven mentioned in the Apocalypse (iii, 1-6), was the episcopal seeof Melito in the time of Antomnus Pius. Two famous roads led from Sardis: one to Pergamoe by way of Thyatira, tile other to Smyrna. All three cities are mentioned among the seven Churches of the Apocalypse. Thyatim was known especially for its gild of dyers. The Lydia mentioned in Acts xvi, 14, called a " seller of purple," had probably come to Philippi with wool which had been dyed at home. Thyatira plays an important pan in the history of Montar nism (Epiphanius, Hier., li, 33). Taking a western road from Thyatim one comes to Smyrna, where in 195 a.c. atemplewas built in honorof the den Rome. Tiberius allowed a temple to be erected

316

Asia Minor THE NEW SCHAFF-HERZOG 318

here to himself, his mother, and the senate. Politically Smyrna was not as important as Ephesus; but it had the reputation of being the most beautiful city of Asia. Jews in Smyrna are mentioned in Rev. ii, 9 and in the Martyrium Polycarpi, xii, 2, and both times as enemies of the Christians. Paul does not seem to have done missionary work there; but that the congregation was founded by John is not a necessary inference. By the " angel of the church in Smyrna " (Rev. ii, 8) Polycarp might be meant, had not the epistles to the seven churches originated in a much earlier period than the final redaction of the Apocalypse. From Smyrna the road leads by way of Gyme, Myrina, and Elea to Pergamos, where it meets the road to Thyatira. Pergamos, the ancient royal city of the Attalides, was still famous under the Roman empire. In the time of Augustus (29 B.c.) the first provincial temple was erected here, and by the side of Ephesus Pergamos seems to have been the most prominent city in Asia. It was famous for the cult of lEsculapius. Although the Jews had influence, they were not the cause of the animosities mentioned in Rev. ii, 12-17. Though they are called in the Apocalypse a " synagogue of Satan " (ii, 9), it is most unlikely that they are meant by the words: " I know . . . where thou dwellest, where Satan's seat is" (ii, 13); the language points to a more concrete phenomenon, which might be thought of as an embodiment of Satan, and no doubt refers to the worship of IEsculapius. This " savior," whose symbol was the serpent, and who, according to Justin (Apologia, i, 21, 22), looked much like Christ, could easily appear as a devilish caricature of the Son of God. The words " hast not denied my faith" imply that in the days of Antipas the population made an effort to force the worship of Xsculapius upon others.

From the seaport Adramyttium, where there was a canventus juridicus, following the north coast of the Adramyttian bay the road leads to Assos, where Paul seems to have been active (Acts xx, 13-14). It was the birthplace of Cleanthes the Stoic. Troas, or rather Alexandria, became famous under Roman sway. Augustus made it a colony. It was the seaport from which Paul went to Macedonia (Acts xvi, 11). It is perhaps characteristic of the Roman citizen, that, besides Ephesus, Troas is the only city of the province of Asia where Paul labored in person (Acts xx, 5-7; II Cor, ii, 12; II Tim. iv, 13). The Church of Troas is not mentioned in the Apocalypse, but is referred to by Ignatius in his epistles to the Philadelphians (xi, 2) and Smyrnmans (xii, 2). Abydus, Lampsacus, and Cyzicus were not included in Paul's mission.

V. The Islands of the Sgean Sea belonged in great part to the province of Asia. Tenedos was opposite Alexandria Troas; Lesbos, with the capital Mytilene, or as the later form reads in Acts xx, 14, Mitylene, was the first station on the passage from Assos. Thence Paul sailed (Acts xx, 15) to chios, opposite the Ionic peninsula. On the following day he reached Samoa. According to the reading of Codex D, he seems not to have tarried on the island itself in the city of Samos, but in the town of Trogyllium on a little isle of like name before the

cape, mentioned by Strabo. South of Samos lay the small island of Patmos. Following the route of Paul (Acts xxi, 1) one comes to Coos and Rhodes. During the last decades before Christ, Rhodes was a center of culture; it was the native place of the Stoic Panaetius, whose work " On Duty " Cicero used in his De ofciis; in Rhodes, too, labored his pupil Posidonius (about 90-50 s.c.); the rhetorician Apollonius Molon, the teacher of Cicero and Caesar; and Theodore of Gadara, the teacher of Tiberius.

VI. The Province Pontus-Bithynia: When King Nicomedes III, Philopator, of Bithynia bequeathed in 74 s.c. his country to the Romans, the governor of Asia made it a province, and it was extended toward the east in 64 B.c. by annexing north Paphlagonia and Pontus. After the separation of Pontus Galaticus, which was joined to Galatia, the new province with the double name Pontus (and) Bithynia comprised the entire coast region east of the Rhyndacus, north of Mt. Olympus, extending beyond the Halys to the city of Amisus. As a senatorial province it was ruled by proconsuls with a legate, a questor, and six lictors. Pliny the Younger was an extraordinary governor, who was sent to the province (111-112 A.D.) to regulate its finances. The domestic conditions in Bithynia are described not only in the correspondence of Pliny the Younger with Trajan, but also in the speeches of the sophist Dio Chrysostomus of Prusa, which have much of interest to the investigator of early Christianity (ed. H. von Arnim, 2 vols., Berlin, 1893-96; cf. also idem, Dio von Prusa, ib. 1898). The most noteworthy of the cities of Pontus and Bithynia were Apamea, Chalcedon, Byzantium, and Prusa. A court of judgment was also at Nica;a (see NicmA, ComvciLs op), where there was a temple of the dea Roma and of the divus Julius, whereas the provincial temple was at Nicomedia. In Pontus were Amastris, Sinope, Amisus, Abonuteichus, and Comana. Concerning the Jews in Pontus and Bithynia cf. Acts ii, 9, xviii, 2. The spread of Christianity in Pontus is attested by Pliny (Epist., xevi, 9).

VIL The Province Galatia has a complicated history. Its boundaries were often changed. It derived its name from the Celtic tribes which :fated to Asia Minor in the third century B.c., and, according to Strabo, occupied the eastern part of Phrygia. Without going into details, it can be assumed that in the New Testament " Galatia " means not the seat of the three Celtic tribes, but the Roman province including Pisid ;a and Lycaonia, therefore the territory of the first Pauline missionary journey. The question is of interest whether by "the Churches of Galatia " (Gal. i, 2) Paul understood only those of the first missionary journey. He shows an inclination to address his Church according to provinces, following the Roman provincial divisions. When he addresses a Church with reference to its special needs, he naturally speaks to Corinthians, Thessalonians, Philippians; but where he overlooks his missionary territory as a whole, he uses the provincial names. There is no reason to believe that "the Churches of Galatia " means anything else than the Churches

317

317 RELIGIOUS ENCYCLOPEDIA Asia Minor

of the Roman province. Since the Epistle to the Galatians was not addressed to one Church, but to a number of Churches, Paul had to select a name expressive of all; and the designation "Churches of Galatia" was quite natural and appropriate for the Roman citizen, to whom the political divisions of the empire, were no fortuitous arrangement, but a moral good. In the time of Paul there were no Galatians in the old sense; and the name means subjects of the Roman emperor belonging to the province of Galatia. Similarly Tychicus and the Ephesian Trophimus (Acts xxi, 29) are said to be of Asia (xx, 4); and Gaius and Aristarchus are called Macedonians (xix, 29, xxvii, 2; cf. II Cor. ix, 2, 4 ), although Gaius was certainly no Macedonian by birth. Of the Galatian cities Ancyra was the seat of the governor, having the provincial temple of Augustus and of the den Roma, on the walls of which the deeds of Augustus were inscribed (the so-called nwnumentum Ancyronum). From Ancyra the road leads eastward to Tavium, the ancient capital of the Trocmee. The capital of the Tolistobogi was Pessinus, famous for the rich temple dedicated to Cybele, whom the natives called Agdistis