Apocrypha - Oxford Edition Combined with the 1947 RSV Edition.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1)  The following books are in the Apocrypha:
    Books                              Abbreviation
    1 Esdras                                1Es
    2 Esdras                                2Es
    Tobit                                   Tob
    Judith                                  Jdt
    Rest of Esther                          Est
    Wisdom of Solomon                       Wis
    Ecclesiasticus                          Ecc
    Baruch, with the Epistle of Jeremiah    Bar
    Prayer of Azariah and the
       Song of the Three Holy Children      Aza
    History of Susanna                      Sus
    Bel and the Dragon                      Bel
    Prayer of Manasses                      Man
    1 Maccabees                             1Ma
    2 Maccabees                             2Ma
    From the 1947 RSV, no Oxford text
    3 Maccabees                             3Ma
    4 Maccabees                             4Ma
    Psalm 151                               2Ps
2) The two prologues to Ecclesiasticus are appended to the end of that
   book as chapters 52 and 53.  The verse number was arbitrarily
   introduced to these prologues to make it easier to reference.
   The RSV omits the first prologue which corresponds to chapter 52.
3) RSV verse numbering was followed for "The Prayer of Manasses" to
   make it easier to reference.
4) The last three books for the Apocrypha were taken from the RSV
   and are not in the Oxford edition nor were they in the 1973 edition
   of the RSV. These are used by the Greek Orthodox Church and are
   not in the Roman Catholic editions.
5) The Apocrypha was dropped when the 1769 edition of the Authorised
   version was produced. Obvious spelling errors in the Oxford edition
   were corrected.
6) The Online Bible cross-reference and other facilities do not work
   with this module.
7) This has never been accepted at scriptures for the following reasons:
   a) The Jews never considered them part of their sacred canon.
   b) Christ rejected them by citing the scriptures as the "Law, the
      Prophets, and the Psalms". The Jews would understand that to
      be what we now consider the 39 books of the Old Testament.
   c) They are never quoted in the Bible.
   d) They are unreliable and contradict known historical facts and
      doctrines in the Bible. See topic 22551 for a detailed list.
      e.g. 2 Mac 12:44,45, Wis 13:18 etc.
   e) The number of books, the verse numbering and the actual verses
      themselves vary greatly depending on who prints the Apocrytha.
      This is not definitely something you would want to depend on!
8) Send in the user declaration form to CCAT. See "General Info"
   on the Mini Menu.
9) The following is the introduction from the Oxford edition of the
   Apocrypha.
                          THE APOCRYPHA
These Books form part of the sacred literature of the Alexandria Jews,
and with the exception of the Second Book of Esdras are found
interspersed with the Hebrew Scriptures in the ancient copies of the
Septuagint, or Greek Version of the Old Testament. They are the product
of the era subsequent to the Captivity; having their origin partly in
Babylonia, partly in Palestine and Egypt and perhaps other countries.
Most of them belong to the last three centuries B.C., when prophecy,
oracles, and direct revelation had ceased. Some of them form an
historical link between the Old and New Testament, others have a
linguistic value in connection with the Hellenistic phraseology of the
latter. The narratives of the Apocrypha are partly historical records,
and partly allegorical. The religious poetry is to a large extent a
paraphrase upon the Poetical and Prophetical Books of the Hebrew Canon.
In the paraphrases upon the latter there is often a near approach to
New Testament teaching, especially upon God's care for the heathen
world.
As to their Canonical Authority, Josephus seems to reject it as a
whole, but appears from his use of I Esdras rather than our Canonical
Ezra to have accepted the authenticity of at least that work. The early
Christians differed in opinion respecting them, but received them as
part of the sacred literature of Israel. Several of the books of the
Apocrypha were more generally accepted than the disputed books of the
New Testament Canon. Melito (cir. 170), referring to the Hebrew Canon,
separated them from the authoritative and Divine records; while Origen
(cir. 230), following the LXX, included in Daniel (and so among the
Canonical Books) the history of Susanna; and speaks ambiguously about
the Books of the Maccabees. Jerome, a century later, called them
"apocryphal" (hidden, secret, and so of uncertain origin and
authority), affirming (when speaking of Wisdom and Ecclesiasticus)
"that the Church doth read them for example of life and instruction of
manners; but yet doth it not apply them to establish any doctrine". In
the Western Church they gradually rose in esteem, until the Council of
Trent affirmed the canonicity of the greater part; but they are treated
by the more critical Roman divines as "deutero-canonical", thus making
some distraction between them and the books of the Hebrew Canon.
A Dissertation on the Apocryphal Writings
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
See topic 22551 for a very complete overview on the Apocrypha by John
Gill.  That material was taken from his Exposition of the whole Bible
volume six, pages 777 to 789. This material was written about 1750
before the Apocrypha was deleted from the Authorised Version in 1769.