We're making big changes. Please try out the beta site at beta.ccel.org and send us feedback. Thank you!

The Nature of Scripture and Revelation

How should scripture be interpreted? Is it all infallible and absolutely true? Is it all literal, or is it all metaphorical? Or is it somewhere in between?

My personal feeling is that scripture is a little bit of all that, but I'm trying to iron it all out, so any input you have is very very welcome.

There's a radio station in the Bay Area (where I live) that has an adverstisement for their home Bible study course, and they say bluntly that scripture should interpret scripture.

I can hang with that. But then they go on to say that, accordingly, we don't need to consider the initial intentions, meanings, cultures, or circumstances surrounding the Bible. Something there sounds a little fishy to me. I don't see the Bible making that claim for itself--though in II Timothy, Paul says that all scripture is indeed profitable for many things. Why, if the Bible is infallible, would we need to make the ADDITIONAL claim ON BEHALF of the Bible that it is indeed infallible--would an infallible book not make that claim for itself?

So how should we, as followers of Jesus, approach scripture? Sometimes, I think I see Jesus revering the scriptures he had, the Law of Moses--like during his wilderness temptations. Other times, though, it seems like he dismisses the Mosaic Law--particularly those scriptures regarding the Sabbath, the purity scriptures, and the scripture on divorce. Lots of people I know like to say that because Jesus was God he could do whatever he wanted in regard to the Word--but if God never changes, why did He change his eternal Word?

And, if we must then conclude that the law is just a temporary expression of an eternal Word, and then apply it to the New Testament canon, we have something of a loose standard for interpreting scripture. So, uh, that's where I'm at--how SHOULD we approach interpreting the Bible?

Inerrant? by JStaller (not verified)
okay. by JStaller (not verified)
Scripture by JonathanD
that IS a good rendering by JStaller (not verified)
Never changes: by JStaller (not verified)
the ENTIRE MOSAIC LAW law law law... by JStaller (not verified)
I could buy that by JStaller (not verified)
No accusers by michael_legna
Interesting parallel, there, Michael... by JStaller (not verified)
Big difference by michael_legna
Symbolism by JStaller (not verified)
Symbolism by fr_wayne_mcnamara
I think so by JStaller (not verified)
Good recommendations :) by JStaller (not verified)
He did by Loutzenhiser
Hey again, by talmid
More thought by JStaller (not verified)
Scripture Interprets Scripture???? by fr_wayne_mcnamara

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.