35. Finally, if you think it
right, returning to our inquiry, we ask this of you, whether you think
that all stories about the gods,45004500 that is, without any exception,45014501 have been written
throughout with a double meaning and sense, and in a way45024502 admitting of
several interpretations; or that some parts of them are not ambiguous
at all, while, on the contrary, others have many meanings, and
are enveloped in the veil of allegory which has been thrown round
them? For if the whole structure and arrangement of the narrative
have been surrounded with a veil of allegory from beginning to end,
explain to us, tell us, what we should put and substitute
for each thing which every story says, and to what other things and
meanings we should refer45034503 each. For as, to take an example,
you wish Jupiter to be said instead of the rain, Ceres for the earth,
and for Libera45044504 and father
Dis the sinking and casting of seed into the earth, so you ought
to say what we should understand for the bull, what for the wrath and
anger of Ceres; what the word Brimo45054505 means; what the anxious prayer of Jupiter;
what the gods sent to make intercession for him, but not listened to;
what the castrated ram; what the parts45064506 of the castrated ram; what the
satisfaction made with these; what the further dealings with his
daughter, still more unseemly in their lustfulness; so, in the other
story also, what the grove and flowers of Henna are; what the fire
taken from Ætna, and the torches lit with it; what the travelling
through the world with these; what the Attic country, the canton of
Eleusin, the hut of Baubo, and her rustic hospitality; what the drought
of cyceon45074507means, the
refusal of it, the shaving and disclosure of the privy parts, the
shameful charm of the sight, and the forgetfulness of her bereavement
produced by such means. Now, if you point out what should be put
in the place of all these, changing the one for the other,45084508 we shall admit
your assertion; but if you can neither present another supposition in
each case, nor appeal to45094509
the context as a whole, why do you make that obscure,45104510 by means of fair-seeming allegories, which
has been spoken plainly, and disclosed to the understanding of
all?