« Prev Change Not Always Improvement. Next »

Chapter IV.—Change Not Always Improvement.

Why, now, if the Roman fashion is (social) salvation to every one, are you nevertheless Greek to a degree, even in points not honourable?  Or else, if it is not so, whence in the world is it that provinces which have had a better training, provinces which nature adapted rather for surmounting by hard struggling the difficulties of the soil, derive the pursuits of the wrestling-ground—pursuits which fall into a sad old age3737    Male senescentia.  Rig. (as quoted by Oehler) seems to interpret, “which entail a feeble old age.”  Oehler himself seems to take it to mean “pursuits which are growing very old, and toiling to no purpose.” and labour in vain—and the unction with mud,3838    Or, as some take it, with wax (Oehler). and the rolling in sand, and the dry dietary?  Whence comes it that some of our Numidians, with their long locks made longer by horsetail plumes, learn to bid the barber shave their skin close, and to exempt their crown alone from the knife?  Whence comes it that 9men shaggy and hirsute learn to teach the resin3939    Used as a depilatory. to feed on their arms with such rapacity, the tweezers to weed their chin so thievishly?  A prodigy it is, that all this should be done without the Mantle!  To the Mantle appertains this whole Asiatic practice!  What hast thou, Libya, and thou, Europe, to do with athletic refinements, which thou knowest not how to dress?  For, in sooth, what kind of thing is it to practise Greekish depilation more than Greekish attire?

The transfer of dress approximates to culpability just in so far as it is not custom, but nature, which suffers the change.  There is a wide enough difference between the honour due to time, and religion.  Let Custom show fidelity to Time, Nature to God.  To Nature, accordingly, the Larissæan hero4040    Achilles. gave a shock by turning into a virgin; he who had been reared on the marrows of wild beasts (whence, too, was derived the composition of his name, because he had been a stranger with his lips to the maternal breast4141    ᾽Αχιλλεύς:  from privative, and χεῖλος, the lip.  See Oehler.); he who had been reared by a rocky and wood-haunting and monstrous trainer4242    The Centaur Chiron, namely. in a stony school.  You would bear patiently, if it were in a boy’s case, his mother’s solicitude; but he at all events was already be-haired, he at all events had already secretly given proof of his manhood to some one,4343    Deianira, of whom he had begotten Pyrrhus (Oehler). when he consents to wear the flowing stole,4444    See the note on this word in de Idol., c. xviii. to dress his hair, to cultivate his skin, to consult the mirror, to bedizen his neck; effeminated even as to his ear by boring, whereof his bust at Sigeum still retains the trace.  Plainly afterwards he turned soldier:  for necessity restored him his sex.  The clarion had sounded of battle:  nor were arms far to seek.  “The steel’s self,” says (Homer), “attracteth the hero.”4545    Hom., Od., xvi. 294 (Oehler).  Else if, after that incentive as well as before, he had persevered in his maidenhood, he might withal have been married!  Behold, accordingly, mutation!  A monster, I call him,—a double monster:  from man to woman; by and by from woman to man:  whereas neither ought the truth to have been belied, nor the deception confessed.  Each fashion of changing was evil:  the one opposed to nature, the other contrary to safety.

Still more disgraceful was the case when lust transfigured a man in his dress, than when some maternal dread did so:  and yet adoration is offered by you to me, whom you ought to blush at,—that Clubshaftandhidebearer, who exchanged for womanly attire the whole proud heritage of his name!  Such licence was granted to the secret haunts of Lydia,4646    Jos. Mercer, quoted by Oehler, appears to take the meaning to be, “to his clandestine Lydian concubine;” but that rendering does not seem necessary. that Hercules was prostituted in the person of Omphale, and Omphale in that of Hercules.  Where were Diomed and his gory mangers? where Busiris and his funereal altars? where Geryon, triply one?  The club preferred still to reek with their brains when it was being pestered with unguents!  The now veteran (stain of the) Hydra’s and of the Centaurs’ blood upon the shafts was gradually eradicated by the pumice-stone, familiar to the hair-pin! while voluptuousness insulted over the fact that, after transfixing monsters, they should perchance sew a coronet!  No sober woman even, or heroine4747    Viraginis; but perhaps =virginis.  See the Vulg. in Gen. ii. 23. of any note, would have adventured her shoulders beneath the hide of such a beast, unless after long softening and smoothening down and deodorization (which in Omphale’s house, I hope, was effected by balsam and fenugreek-salve:  I suppose the mane, too, submitted to the comb) for fear of getting her tender neck imbued with lionly toughness.  The yawning mouth stuffed with hair, the jaw-teeth overshadowed amid the forelocks, the whole outraged visage, would have roared had it been able.  Nemea, at all events (if the spot has any presiding genius), groaned:  for then she looked around, and saw that she had lost her lion.  What sort of being the said Hercules was in Omphale’s silk, the description of Omphale in Hercules’ hide has inferentially depicted.

But, again, he who had formerly rivalled the Tirynthian4848    i.e., Hercules.—the pugilist Cleomachus—subsequently, at Olympia, after losing by efflux his masculine sex by an incredible mutation—bruised within his skin and without, worthy to be wreathed among the “Fullers” even of Novius,4949    Or, “which are now attributed to Novius.”  Novius was a writer of that kind of farce called “Atellanæ fabulæ;” and one of his farces—or one attributed to him in Tertullian’s day—was called “The Fullers.” and deservedly commemorated by the mimographer Lentulus in his Catinensians—did, of course, not only cover with bracelets the traces left by (the bands of) the cestus, but likewise supplanted the coarse ruggedness of his athlete’s cloak with some superfinely wrought tissue.

Of Physco and Sardanapalus I must be silent, whom, but for their eminence in lusts, no one would recognise as kings.  But I must be silent, for fear lest even they set up a muttering concerning some of your Cæsars, equally lost to shame; for fear lest a mandate have been given to canine5050    i.e., cynical; comp. de Pa., c. ii. ad init. constancy to point to a Cæsar impurer than Physco, softer than Sardanapalus, and indeed a second Nero.5151    i.e., Domitian, called by Juv. calvum Neronem, Sat. iv. 38.

Nor less warmly does the force of vainglory 10also work for the mutation of clothing, even while manhood is preserved.  Every affection is a heat:  when, however, it is blown to (the flame of) affectation, forthwith, by the blaze of glory, it is an ardour.  From this fuel, therefore, you see a great king5252    Alexander.—inferior only to his glory—seething.  He had conquered the Median race, and was conquered by Median garb.  Doffing the triumphal mail, he degraded himself into the captive trousers!  The breast dissculptured with scaly bosses, by covering it with a transparent texture he bared; punting still after the work of war, and (as it were) softening, he extinguished it with the ventilating silk!  Not sufficiently swelling of spirit was the Macedonian, unless he had likewise found delight in a highly inflated garb:  only that philosophers withal (I believe) themselves affect somewhat of that kind; for I hear that there has been (such a thing as) philosophizing in purple.  If a philosopher (appears) in purple, why not in gilded slippers5353    Comp. de Idol., c. viii. med. too?  For a Tyrian5454    i.e., one who affects Tyrian—dresses in Tyrian purple. to be shod in anything but gold, is by no means consonant with Greek habits.  Some one will say, “Well, but there was another5555    Empedocles (Salm. in Oehler). who wore silk indeed, and shod himself in brazen sandals.”  Worthily, indeed, in order that at the bottom of his Bacchantian raiment he might make some tinkling sound, did he walk in cymbals!  But if, at that moment, Diogenes had been barking from his tub, he would not (have trodden on him5656    I have adopted Oehler’s suggestion, and inserted these words.) with muddy feet—as the Platonic couches testify—but would have carried Empedocles down bodily to the secret recesses of the Cloacinæ;5757    i.e., of Cloacina or Cluacina (="the Purifier,” a name of Venus; comp. White and Riddle), which Tertullian either purposely connects with “cloaca,” a sewer (with which, indeed, it may be really connected, as coming derivatively from the same root), and takes to mean “the nymphs of the sewers” apparently. in order that he who had madly thought himself a celestial being might, as a god, salute first his sisters,5858    The nymphs above named (Oehler). and afterwards men.  Such garments, therefore, as alienate from nature and modesty, let it be allowed to be just to eye fixedly and point at with the finger and expose to ridicule by a nod.  Just so, if a man were to wear a dainty robe trailing on the ground with Menander-like effeminacy, he would hear applied to himself that which the comedian says, “What sort of a cloak is that maniac wasting?”  For, now that the contracted brow of censorial vigilance is long since smoothed down, so far as reprehension is concerned, promiscuous usage offers to our gaze freedmen in equestrian garb, branded slaves in that of gentlemen, the notoriously infamous in that of the freeborn, clowns in that of city-folk, buffoons in that of lawyers, rustics in regimentals; the corpse-bearer, the pimp, the gladiator trainer, clothe themselves as you do.  Turn, again, to women.  You have to behold what Cæcina Severus pressed upon the grave attention of the senate—matrons stoleless in public.  In fact, the penalty inflicted by the decrees of the augur Lentulus upon any matron who had thus cashiered herself was the same as for fornication; inasmuch as certain matrons had sedulously promoted the disuse of garments which were the evidences and guardians of dignity, as being impediments to the practising of prostitution.  But now, in their self-prostitution, in order that they may the more readily be approached, they have abjured stole, and chemise, and bonnet, and cap; yes, and even the very litters and sedans in which they used to be kept in privacy and secrecy even in public.  But while one extinguishes her proper adornments, another blazes forth such as are not hers.  Look at the street-walkers, the shambles of popular lusts; also at the female self-abusers with their sex; and, if it is better to withdraw your eyes from such shameful spectacles of publicly slaughtered chastity, yet do but look with eyes askance, (and) you will at once see (them to be) matrons!  And, while the overseer of brothels airs her swelling silk, and consoles her neck—more impure than her haunt—with necklaces, and inserts in the armlets (which even matrons themselves would, of the guerdons bestowed upon brave men, without hesitation have appropriated) hands privy to all that is shameful, (while) she fits on her impure leg the pure white or pink shoe; why do you not stare at such garbs? or, again, at those which falsely plead religion as the supporter of their novelty? while for the sake of an all-white dress, and the distinction of a fillet, and the privilege of a helmet, some are initiated into (the mysteries of) Ceres; while, on account of an opposite hankering after sombre raiment, and a gloomy woollen covering upon the head, others run mad in Bellona’s temple; while the attraction of surrounding themselves with a tunic more broadly striped with purple, and casting over their shoulders a cloak of Galatian scarlet, commends Saturn (to the affections of others).  When this Mantle itself, arranged with more rigorous care, and sandals after the Greek model, serve to flatter Æsculapius,5959    i.e., are worn by his votaries. how much more should you then accuse and assail it with your eyes, as being guilty of superstition—albeit superstition simple and unaffected?  Certainly, when first it clothes this wisdom6060    i.e., Christianity.  Cf. 1 Cor. ii. 6, 7. which renounces superstitions with all their vanities, then most assuredly is the Mantle, above all the garments in which you array your gods and goddesses, an august robe; and, above all the caps 11and tufts of your Salii and Flamines, a sacerdotal attire.  Lower your eyes, I advise you, (and) reverence the garb, on the one ground, meantime, (without waiting for others,) of being a renouncer of your error.


« Prev Change Not Always Improvement. Next »
Please login or register to save highlights and make annotations
Corrections disabled for this book
Proofing disabled for this book
Printer-friendly version





Advertisements



| Define | Popups: Login | Register | Prev Next | Help |