LXXXIV.
Parable of the Good Samaritan.
(Probably Judæa.)
C Luke X. 25–37.
c 25 And behold, a certain lawyer stood up and made
trial of him, saying, Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?
[For the term lawyer see pp. 313, 314, The lawyer wished to make trial of the
skill of Jesus in solving the intricate and difficult question as to how to
obtain salvation. Jesus was probably teaching in some house or courtyard, and
his habit of giving local color to his parables suggests that he was probably
in or near Bethany, through which the road from Jerusalem to Jericho passes.
The lawyer stood up to attract attention to himself, and thus give emphasis to
his question and its answer.] 26 And he said unto him, What is written in
the law? how readest thou? [Looking upon Jesus as a sabbath-breaker and a
despiser of tradition, the lawyer no doubt expected that Jesus would lay down
some new rule for obtaining salvation. If so, he was surprised to be thus
referred to the law of Moses for his answer.] 27 And he answering said, Thou
shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with
all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself.
[Deut. vi. 4, 5; Lev. xix. 18. Having
made himself conspicuous by standing up, the lawyer had to give the best answer
he knew or sully his own reputation for knowledge. He therefore gives the two
great laws which comprise all other laws.] 28 And he said unto him, Thou
hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live. [The lawyer had asked
his question simply as a test. With him the law was simply matter for
speculation and theory, and the word “do” was very startling. It
showed the difference between his and the Master's views of the law. He had
hoped by a question to expose Jesus as one who set aside the law, but
476Jesus had exposed the lawyer as one who merely theorized about the
law, and himself as one who advocated the doing of the law.] 29 But he,
desiring to justify himself, said unto Jesus, And who is my neighbor? [He
could justify his conduct if permitted to define the word
“neighbor.” He asked his question, therefore, in the expectation of
securing such a definition of the word as would enable him to maintain his
public standing and quiet his conscience.] 30 Jesus made answer and said, A
certain man [evidently a Jew, for otherwise the nationality would have been
specified] was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho; and he fell among
robbers, who both stripped him and beat him, and departed, leaving him half
dead. [The road from Jerusalem to Jericho is eighteen miles long, and
descends about 3,500 feet. About two miles from Jerusalem it passes through the
village of Bethany, and for the rest of the eighteen miles it passes through
desolate mountain ravines without any habitation save the inn, the ruins of
which are still seen about half way to Jericho. This district from that time
till the present has been noted for robberies, and Jerome tells that the road
was called the “bloody way.”] 31 And by chance a certain priest
was going down that way [a very natural thing for a priest to do, for there
was a very large priestly settlement at Jericho]: and when he saw
him, he passed by on the other side. [He did this although the law
commanded mercy and help to a neighbor—Ex.
xxiii. 4; Deut. xxii. 1–4.] 32 And in like manner a Levite
also [A temple minister. The tribe of Levi had been set apart by God for
his service], when he came to the place, and saw him, passed by on
the other side. [In the priest and Levite the lawyer saw the picture of his
own life, for he saw in them those who knew the law, but did not practice it.
There may have been many excuses for this neglect of the wounded man: danger,
hate, dread of defilement, expense, but Jesus does not consider any of them
worth mentioning.] 33 But a certain Samaritan [the hereditary enemy of
the Jew—John iv. 9], as
he journeyed, came
477where he was: and when he saw him, he
was moved with compassion, 34 and came to him, and bound up his
wounds, pouring on them oil and
wine [the ordinary remedies for wounds—
Isa. i. 6]; and he set him on his own beast, and brought
him to an inn, and took care of him. 35 And on the morrow he took
out two shillings [the shilling or denarius was worth about seventeen
cents, but it represented the price of a day's labor], and gave them
to the host [the inn-keeper], and said, Take care of him; and
whatsoever thou spendest more, I, when I come back again, will repay thee.
[The compassion of the Samaritan bore full fruitage. However heterodox he was,
he was after all a worshiper of Jehovah and more orthodox at heart than either
the priest or the Levite. Though it was not customary for an inn-keeper to
furnish food either for man or beast, he could do so if he chose out of his own
stores. The scant cash left by the Samaritan indicates a poverty which made his
charity the more praiseworthy. His eye and heart and hand and foot and purse
were all subservient to the law of God.] 36 Which of these three, thinkest
thou, proved neighbor unto him that fell among the robbers? [Instead of
answering didactically, “Everybody is your neighbor,” Jesus had
incarnated the law of neighborliness in the good Samaritan, and had made it so
beautiful that the lawyer could not but commend it even when found in a
representative of this apostate race. He showed, too, that the law was not for
causistry but for practice.] 37 And he said, He that showed mercy on him.
[The lawyer avoided the name Samaritan so distasteful to his lips. Jesus gave
countenance to no such racial prejudice, even though the Samaritans had
rejected him but a few weeks before this—Luke
ix. 53.] Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise.
[All the laws and teachings of God are to be generously interpreted (Matt. v. 43, 44) and are to be embodied in the
life—Matt. vii. 24–27.]
478