SECT. III. A proof against the Mahometans, taken out of the sacred
books of the Hebrews and Christians; and that they are not corrupted.
MAHOMET and his followers confess, that both Moses757757 and Jesus
were sent by God;758758 and that they who first propagated
233the institution of Jesus were holy men.759759 But there are
many things related in the Alcoran,760760 which is the law of Mahomet, directly contrary
to what is delivered by Moses, and the disciples of Jesus. To instance in one example
out of many: all the apostles and disciples of Jesus entirely agree in this testimony,
that Jesus died upon the cross, returned to life upon the third day, and was seen
of many: on the contrary, Mahomet says, that Jesus was privately taken up into heaven,761761
and that a certain resemblance of him was fixed to the cross; and consequently Jesus
was not dead, but the eyes of the Jews were deceived. This objection cannot be evaded,
unless Mahomet will say, as indeed he does, that the books both of Moses, and of the disciples of Jesus,762762 have not continued as they were, but
are corrupted; but this fiction we have already confuted in the third book. Certainly,
if any one should say, that the Alcoran is corrupted, the Mahometans would
deny it, and say, that that was a sufficient answer to a thing which was not proved.
Bat they cannot easily bring such arguments for the uncorruptedness of their book,
as we bring for ours, viz. that copies of them were immediately dispersed all over
the world; and that not, like the Alcoran, in one language only; and were faithfully preserved, by so many
sects, who differed so much in other things. The Mahometans persuade themselves,
that in the xivth chapter of St. John, which speaks of sending the Comforter, there
was something written of Mahomet, which the Christians have put out: but here we
may ask them; do they suppose
234this alteration of the Scripture to have been made after the coming
of Mahomet, or before? It is plainly impossible to have been done after the corning
of Mahomet, because at that time there were extant, all over the world, very many
copies, not only Greek, but Syriac, Arabic, and in places distant from Arabia, Ethiopic
and Latin, of more versions than one. Before the coming of Mahomet, there was no
reason for such a change; for nobody could know what Mahomet would teach; further,
if the doctrine of Mahomet had nothing in it contrary to the doctrine of Jesus,
the Christians would as easily have received his books, as they did the books of
Moses and the Hebrew prophets. Let us suppose on each side, that there was nothing
written either of the doctrine of Jesus, or of that of Mahomet; equity will tell
us, that that is to be esteemed the doctrine of Jesus, in which all Christians agree; and that the doctrine of Mahomet, in
which all Mahometans agree.