SECT. IV. The authority of those books which hare no name
to them evident from the nature of the writings.
THERE is no reason why any one should detract from the
credibility of the epistle to the Hebrews upon this account only, because we do
not know who wrote it; and so likewise of the two epistles of John, and the Revelation,
because
128some have doubted whether John the apostle wrote them, or
another of the same name. For, in writers,386386 the nature of the writings is more to
be regarded than the name. Wherefore we receive many historical books, whose authors
we are ignorant of, as that of Cæsar’s Alexandrian war, viz. because we see, that,
whoever the author was, he lived in those times, and was present at those matters;
so likewise ought we to be satisfied, when those who wrote the books we are now
speaking of, testify that they lived in the first age, and were endued with the
apostolical gifts. And if any one should object against this, that these qualities
may be feigned, as may the names in other writings, he would say a thing that is
by no means credible, viz. that they, who every where press the study of truth
and piety, should without any reason bring themselves under the guilt of a lie,
which is not only abhorred by all good men, bat was punished with death by the
Roman laws.387387