5. A fourth request of the same kind.
After this, a whole year elapsed before I was again called to an account about such matters. But I must not omit to mention,
that in the year 1607, a short time before the meeting of the Synod of South Holland at Delft, John Bernards, minister of
the Church at Delft, Festus Hommius, minister of Leyden, and Dibbetius of Dort, were deputed by the Synod to come to me and
inquire what progress I had made in the refutation of the Anabaptists. When I had given them a
suitable reply concerning that affair, which was the cause of much conversation among us on both sides, and when they
were just on the point of taking their leave, they begged "that I would not hesitate to reveal to them whatever views and
designs I had formed on the subject of religion, for the purpose of their being communicated to the Synod, by the Deputies,
for the satisfaction of the brethren." But I refused to comply with their intreaties, "because the desired explanation could
given either conveniently or to advantage; and I did not know any place in which it was possible to explain these matters
with greater propriety, than in the national Synod; which, according to the resolution of their most noble and high mightinesses,
the States General, was expected very shortly to assemble." I promised "that I would use every exertion that I might be enabled
in that assembly openly to profess the whole of my sentiments; and that I would employ none of that alleged concealment
or dissimulation about any thing of which they might then complain." I concluded by saying, "that if I were to make my
profession before them as deputies of the Synod of South Holland, I could not commit to their fidelity the relation of what
might transpire, because, in matters of this description, every one was the most competent interpreter of his own meaning."
After these mutual explanations, we parted from each other.